Isn't that kind of your argument though? I know my argument was that the evidence here doesn't point to a designer. We could simply be in one of...
Rad. So what, do we just sit around in our underwear eating Doritos for a week?
Well quite. I always thought the moral message of The Matrix was a little sketchy in that respect. You should want to leave the Matrix, and if...
So? If you want all Christians to be implicated in Hitler's beliefs, why be dominational? You've never cared whether they were Catholics before....
I'm guessing, like, over an size 18, maybe over 20 ("normal" shop sizes, not the weird ones they have in some shitty shops that makes out like a 6...
It's almost as if lies should be taken in relation to their context, rather than just as lies and lies and lies through and through. Sometimes...
Seems like "getting you" is the only criteria you have for whether someone's okay, or whether they're fair game for any accusation you care to...
Yeah, it's kinda which one you'd settle for if you had to choose. I'll be honest, I think if it came to a choice I could live with being wrong.
I guess we kinda agree then. It's often more fun to do something that breaks rules than it is to just do it. I find this a lot in music, people...
Simple enough question. And just to be clear, you're expressing a preference. I know the two aren't always mutually exclusive so there's no need...
I'm saying that someone can gain pleasure from the immorality or transgressive nature of an act which is not pleasurable out of context....
Well, depends. An person can exist within a "moral" society. So they can be breaking the rules of that society. They will seem immoral to...
Um... yes, actually, I'm pretty good at this philosophy thing. I promise you that "immoral" and "amoral" are different things. I kinda wish I...
I didn't think I was and they're really really not the same thing. Immoral = against morals. Amoral = having no morals.
Dolls? or "action figures"?
Immoral maybe. Amoral no.
The point is though, we're not creating those things in defiance of nature. The way the universe is "put together", we are able to construct...
He can't. It's logically impossible for him to make his point. That's the galling thing, I think. He can't claim that we're just victimising...
No. Denying something over and over again doesn't make it false either.
Well we're alive. That's relatively perfect. We're more perfect than, say, a beast whose bones are too dense for it to move within our planet's...
Separate names with a comma.
