And you do? YOU?? :rofl: :smilielol5:
Let me get this straight. You want me to defend an argument I didn't make, when you refuse to defend an argument you did make? I don't think so,...
Well I suppose if I am going to wait for some kind of reason, logic, or facts from you, it's going to be a long wait. After all, as you said in...
I am still waiting for you to explain what an open-air burn temperature of 1000 degrees has to do with anything.
Bulshit. Nice try.
Steel loses its structural strength around 600 degrees F. The jet fuel in question wasn't burning in open air. It was burning inside a building,...
Yes, I get it. It took me a while to catch on. So, if you can't beat 'em, join 'em, right? :)
Oh, you think? :)
Naw. Even they have standards.
Somehow I knew you'd evade the issue. Your lack of integrity is astounding.
Even assuming that the model is accurate (and we don't know that it is), identify two things wrong with this slide.
:smilielol5: LOL Clearly something devastated your mind, because that was a dandy non sequitur.
After 9/11, they interviewed the architect who designed the building. He said there was never a design requirement for it to withstand an...
That is actually a lie. YOU would think that, but that's because you don't put a whole lot of thought into it.
Nice try, loser. The portrait of your hero and role model reveals your goals and methods. [IMG]
I rest my case.
Do you have any idea just how ridiculous you sound with that pompous lawyer-geek talk? You really have no idea of the difference between fact and...
I notice you still didn't address my questions. Loser.
I am asking you to make YOUR case. There are numerous reasons why two fuel explosions would be different. Even a conspiracy nut should be able...
The Mig clip proves that that particular aircraft, hitting that particular surface exploded in that particular way. If you wish to generalize...
Separate names with a comma.
