He wasn't so bad. I don't agree with everything he did (like signing the Metric Conversion Act of '75), but all in all he didn't screw around too...
Not to nitpick, but the word's "hanged," not hung. :)
I see can oil being reserved for things like air freight one day. Unfortunately, it'll prob'ly be for military purposes, too. People sometimes...
Wow, did you even read my post? We'll always have things that need to be transported quickly. Air freight is a fine and efficient means of...
Air travel isn't goin' away. We will see a significant drop in passenger air travel, but we'll always have a need for air freight. Not only that,...
If you cram passengers in like sardines and crawl along at 5 knots you might begin to approach the efficiency of air travel. Good luck finding...
0 reliability. Not practical for moving sizable numbers of passengers or amounts of cargo, and in a reasonable amount of time.
For the sake of a quick comparison, Queen Elizabeth 2 burns 18 tons of fuel per hour and can cross the Atlantic in four days carrying 2000 people....
Politicians setting up institutions to depoliticize science? I somehow doubt that would work. :)
A greater degree of exclusivity? :) It's definitely a neat thought, but personally, I don't feel there is much need for a giant spaceborne...
Um, we already use it now...exclusively.
Right, converting electrical energy to chemical energy and back into electrical energy doesn't do anything to circumvent conservation of energy,...
It seems to me that the only ones to've claimed to make an engine run off water have been fraudsters. Do you think such a thing could be made to...
Sounds...cheap...and worthwhile. :H
Except for maybe some trains, air travel is said to be the most fuel efficient means of transport - hundreds of miles per gallon per seat/ton.
I'm already satisfied, but you can ask if ya want. :)
Since there just isn't any hydrogen free for the taking, it can't be considered a source.
Oh, it can be harnessed easily enough, but at a net loss. Therefore it isn't a source.
Well, at least you have an interesting writing style...
No, you'd merely be converting (and losing) energy you already have, not making more of it. You were misinformed. Because it'd be a waste of...
Separate names with a comma.
