I'd say curvy based on your scale. Though I could go curvier or thinner. You think human sexual attraction is really just a reflection of our vanity? I mean it's probably true in my case...
Nah, it's just what I get. I feel like people blame the victim, or better yet... the person that is experiencing whatever struggle. So, I have these negative experiences with men, but it's not the man's fault for simply being an asshole. It's mine because I'm somehow attracted to men that are mean to me. It's just how life is. You become the victim, or the person that is experiencing whatever struggle. You get hurt because of that. And then you have people who are seeing it from the outside, making all these assumptions that hurt you all over again. That's just life.
No I wouldnt call it vanity. Just compatibility, it doesn't feel right to be with someone whose body is vastly different from your own. At least for me, I know there are plenty of couples out there who have different body types bit it didn't really work in my case If it were vanity I would think my body type was the best and I don't, I would love to be more voluptuous And since i'm on the small side, borderline skinny really, generally only smaller dudes are attracted to me. Bigger guys and muscular guys like girls with generous T&A , i've noticed
Voluptuous? You wouldn't like the attention. Granted, I'm not really voluptuous. I just have large breasts. While, my hips and butt are small. So, I'm top heavy/voluptuous while being skinny on the bottom. It's a weird combination. But, I agree with you... we mate with our counterparts, in terms of lifestyle and body.
I was flipantly joking about why you'd come back to a torturous thread. Cruelty wasn't my intent, and I appologize.
Thanks for the apology. A lot of people don't come back to apologize. So, that's honorable of you. Also, it's fine. I actually have heard such statements many times before (not in a joking manner), so it doesn't hurt as much. It still hurts. But, it's like a quick jolt of pain, and then it's done.
yay thread necromancy. this is what i get for not looking at dates. as for the answer to the op's question - is she healthy? i.e. not on life support from being at either extreme? alright, now comes the personality questions. seriously, I get crap from ladies all the time about 'you don't have a type?' 'I have a set of preferences for what would be the 'ideal' partner, but not having those isn't a deal breaker. being with someone /merely/ because of their looks is like buying your favorite candy bar, unwrapping it, tossing the good bits in the trash and keeping the least worthy part.' if I /had/ to pick a 'type', give me a Carly Rae Jepsen with waist length red hair. That's basically my set of preferences. but i've dated the rainbow, and the whole set of builds, and I get a hell of a lot more thrills out of a girl's big heart and sexy sexy brain than t&a.
I'd rather have thread necromancy (as long as the new posts are relevant to the topic) than 300 posts about the same thing. Seriously never understood why people are so touchy about resurrecting old threads around here.
i think this is a lot of it. i don't know how many times i've seen a thread posted in 2004, by someone banned in 2004, resurrected now just so some creep can say "hey OP, you need to come to wherever i live and suck me off" or whatever. plus, necroposting is an easy target, which can be fun occasionally, as long as you're not chasing people away by mocking it. but yeah, i think every thread from 2004 is more interesting than any 4564650 post thread whose title includes any of the following words: chat, eat, cook, liberal, con, what are you doing, trump, hillary, masturbation, mastrubation, mitsubritean, mater basheen, cock, threesome, trheesum, or youtube.