The Law of Attraction

It is, for this subject (philosophical as opposed to psychological), a memory I can't possibly remember. Leon Kuczynski (?)(he wanted to be one of those phd). geniuses combining Math. with empirical psychology). He couldn't be much to my needs as a speculator, and still probing engineering, just because that topic was so Work Ethics.

What a boring guy B.F. Skinner was. The provocative idea I want is more about true Knowledge not that cliche, Empirical Determinism (or Materialism when actually written about). So 'Beyond Freedom and Dignity' (I'll get unintelligent) why do 'reinforcements' AND 'defence mechanisms' against reinforcements Exist? Did Lazarus have any down in the dungeon while he was still half dead?

 

UNless of course we are telling apart the subjects of philosophical methods used, and then the consequential combatants are at coming to a decision about the meaning of life for no living organism, i.e. the Man of institutional respect for administration policy. Aaah!! Now I remember; that could be mystifying.

 

Knowledge is, being shared. Knowledge is not ambient. Reinforcements and defenses are called for by somnifacient hypnosis and inertia.

 

I don't understand the idea that knowledge is shared. You didn't read what I read, adn vis-a-versa. The moral then that we trust each other's sequential lesson.

 

What I mean by knowledge is, being shared is:
First knowledge is, in the sense that it is a real commodity.
For knowledge to have a cognitive function for us, communication is required because reality is non local.
I read what you said but perhaps I did not comprehend your meaning. What you describe seems to me a practice rather than an apprehension, a social currency.

 

Ohhh, well you're rude to Sartre anyway. The sharing of practice in any workable community must be appropriate. And appropriate must be in an improvement on the pessimistic morals he showed anew unity of construction and destruction.