Ooooh wow. I was blessed with great genetics and have beautiful naturally straight teeth, and I'm not missing a one. I have two trade school degrees, am a registered yoga teacher, and I attended university for architecture and engineering for several years before I lost interest and moved onto better things.
When people call themselves genetically superior or they have good genetics and you ask what they come from often you'll hear oh I'm French Irish, German, English, Scottish with a hint of native American. Mongrel, the correct term for you is Mongrel.
This is a pretty bold statement. Do you have any sources to back it up? I mean, I would buy that Russia was aiding militant 1960s counterculture organizations in the hopes that they would attack/start terrorism campaigns, but I can't really see the benefit to Russia of getting the US out of a war that cost the country a lot of money and ended in defeat. The peaceniks didn't exactly pose a threat to the government-- most of them weren't big on guns or fighting of any kind. FFS part of the reason the USSR collapsed was because the US kept helping their enemies in Afghanistan. It seems to me that Russian aid to the NVA/Viet Cong was a far better strategy for undermining America.
You really need to open your eyes and get your head in the game. The CIA played a hand in developing modern art. Spy games are not all out war you may be familiar with
Apparently not, since the US simply commodified and commercialized the peace movement while the USSR actually collapsed in part due to the endless fighting in Afghanistan.
What exactly are you doing with your 'open eyes'? What does it have to do with the NRA? Do you think owning a gun and joining the NRA is going to protect you from the Russians?
Let me put it this way. The Russians would loooooooove it if there were super strict gun control in the USA.
My point is that war can be a bigger threat to a country's stability than peace or 'chopping its balls off'. So if the Russians DID fund the peace movements, and your point is that peace movements are a threat to America (is this your point?), then I am countering by saying that they are in fact OPPOSED to the bigger threat of endless wars.
Who is they? And what does the last fragment have to do with the rest? Really need to state yourself more clearly.