You are entitled to your name calling if you feel your self worth is raised. Seems very anti left to name call, but hey you are what you are. Don't bitch and yell if someone does the same to you.
But but but but only 3% of the gun owners own 80% of the guns......I heard that in...well some fantasy land somewhere on the board here.
I will say that. I came across this board for a completely different reason. Was told I need to post more. I will agree with you, it is pretty entertaining. I learn more about Donald Trump and which direction his nostrils flare in and what that means for the doom of the world here, than in 5,000 hours of trying to find that info anywhere else in the world. They are a hoot. You couldn't write this stuff if you were paid to. You have to witness it.
3% sounds a little low but many who do own guns own many. So they are all concentrated among a small portion of Americans. Most of are not interested in militia meetings and planning for war. Even many who do hunt. It's just a hobby to them not the revolution.
About 30 % of Americans own guns But I've came across the statistic that 3% of Americans own 50% of guns before. I'm not sure how that was figured but it doesnt sound that far fetched. We already know people stockpile guns, if that figure is accurate it explains the extent of it
I just searched for it and found this. https://www.usnews.com/news/article...ercent-of-americans-own-half-the-nations-guns If we're to believe US News, about 3% of Americans own the majority of guns nationwide.
Could be. I seriously doubt the NRA is lobbying on behalf of 3% of the population. But I don't really follow all of this that closely so *shoulder shrug*
I often wonder what the ratio actually is in this. I realize there are some folks who need to have a dozen or more guns to feel safe (or whatever the motivation). As a minimalist, unfettered by greed or criminal desire, I keep a limited number of guns in the house. I do know people I would characterize as "Gun Nuts" who would laugh at our meager collection. They own well over a dozen guns. What is the mean in terms of gun ownership? And what about ammunition?
I have come across 3 people in my life with lots of guns. All legal. One I'd consider a collector. He didn't have a lot of ammo. But he did somehow acquire an actual rocket launcher. The other 2 while legal gave me the creeps. More than 5000 rounds of ammo. One proudly had 10K rounds. All legal. But you never know who you don't know that has stuff like this. I have one gun and 50 rounds. All RIP rounds. It's gonna be a shitty world if I can't get out of problem with that.
Not LOL - No I think it a lot smaller number than that - but not sure how many gun manufacturing executives there are? But seriously the problem with the gun lobbyists (like yourself) which is glaringly obvious after debating with them for any length of time, is that they have no rational or reasonable arguments against prudent gun control it is as pure and simple as that (and i know you like things simple), it virtually all comes down to ‘I don’t want because I don’t want’ They have two core arguments against prudent gun control (personal defence and defence against bad government) neither of which is that strong. Basically the gun lobby arguments against rational and reasonable gun control seems to be over bar the shouting, the increasingly panicked and shill shouting coming mainly from the gun owning right. As I say they remind me of some type of comic zombies, their stance is dead but they still shuffle on, grunting and groaning ‘guns…guns…I want guns’
Getting back to the subject of the thread. We are trying to reach a consensus about what can be done about mass shootings. A consensus is a general agreement. We aren't here to fight, we're here to seek solutions. Many of us complain about the inability of Congress to reach agreements. Here's our chance to come to some type of consensus on our own. If we can't then we have no right to criticize the government. We all don't have to agree on every point to reach a general consensus on the problem, but we do have to look at facts and data in a rational way. This thread is your opportunity to present facts and data. Opinions don't matter unless they are aimed at reaching a consensus among the group. If your only reason for posting here is to push your own personal agenda, you're in the wrong place. This thread is for those who think that we have too many mass shootings, those who are looking for real solutions, and those who are willing to consider all options in a reasonable manner. Everything from eliminating every single gun in the U.S. to arming every single citizen in the U.S. is up for discussion. Present your facts, data, and analysis and then be ready to defend your position. When you present your facts give your explanation as to how the data you present would either help reduce mass shootings, increase mass shootings, or have no effect at all. No personal insults are needed nor wanted.
This is what we have so far: A Consensus on Mass Shootings 1. All mass shootings are the product of abnormal behavior. 2. Something must be done about abnormal behavior in relation to mass shootings. 3. We will never eliminate every firearm in the U.S. 4. We will never eliminate every mass shooting. 5. Background checks are limited in their value and are only one tool available to lessen mass shootings. 6. Mental health screening and treatment is limited in value and only one tool available to lessen mass shootings. 7. Outside venues can't be made absolutely safe from mass shootings. 8. Private homes can't be made absolutely safe from mass shootings. Comments on the above, or new business.
#5 and #6 I dont like the wording "limited in their value" because it makes me think you are leading us along until we reach a point where because of that, you introduce gun control measures in to the conversation.
Just to repeat... back on topic. I feel like this thread is made with the intention to string us along and then spring gun control on us after we've followed along and to make those who dont seem unreasonable.
Gun control measures are most certainly applicable to the subject, especially since we already have gun control measures as per the Constitution. Do you feel background checks can end mass all shootings? Do you feel mental health screening can end all mass shootings? If so please explain how. I'll listen to anything that can help us lessen these horrendous episodes.
We already have "gun control" in this country. I have presented a series of points in regards to mass shootings. Are any of them bias or incorrect so far, in your opinion? I'm asking everyone to participate and express their views in a civil manner as we look at this problem in depth. If you can contribute any ideas that don't lead to new gun laws or even lessen current laws, and can back up your ideas to the rest of us with facts, figures, and data...great! I really wish I could wave a magic wand and allow everyone to possess any weapon they want and have a good old time doing it without any interference from anyone......and nobody ever gets hurt. Tell me how we can do that.
AR15s fed by 30 round magazines kill a miniscule amount of people compared to handguns and other rifles according to the FBI So we dont need more gun control.