Is There Any Room For God In Modern Science?

I think the chances are extremely low that our planet is the only one to have life in the universe.

That being said, I won't refer to "The ETs" before we actually find them.

You haven't given evidence though. That's our whole point Chinacat. All these months of posting this same topic . . . you have yet to provide any evidence. And when asked, your response is "THATS NOT MY JOB THATS FOR SCIENCE TO FIND" . . . so who is creating the loop here? You haven't even given a scientist anything interesting to look at. Subjectively high body temperature? Ok, maybe I can find a psychology undergrad interested in your subjectively high body temperature. Maybe not, it's not really thrilling stuff, and it doesn't at all lead one to think "Ohhhh, Chinacat must be experiencing a motherfucking KUNDALINI AWAKENING!!!11111111"

Give me a break dude, your shit is weak. Your argument is bad and you should feel bad.

 

Well in the current times, Scientists aren't studying Kundalini, so the only thing that we can currently go by regarding Kundalini is people's subjective experience.

 

Scientists are smart enough to not study it. What is so hard to understand about that?

 

You're right, I feel so bad.

Extreme internal heat as if being in a furnace, prickly electrical sensations, very acute sensitivity to other people's energies, short-term memory loss, extreme feelings of interconnectedness and mystical union for brief amounts of time, pressure in my lower back that has slowly risen to the top of my head over the years, are just a few of the symptoms that i have been going through for years, and still there hasn't even been one doctor that has been able to explain any of it, and I've even had evaluations.

 

What is so hard to understand that if there's a group of people who claim to be going through something that all have a common denominator that they should most definitely be studying it? To not study it is to dis-honor Science itself. This is why modern Science is so bloated and arrogant.

 

Really?

How is science supposed to test that which cannot be perceived in any way except to blindly ignore reason and accept upon mere faith that it is real?

You cannot be this dumb.

 

Find a Scientist who is open-minded and to actually at least try to find some way to detect it with modern instruments, or come up with instruments that can do it. Scientists don't know what Dark Matter is either, but that doesn't mean they have given up on trying to find new ways to detect what it is.

 

They're called ghost hunters, and they haven't found any proof.

 

This Scientist must be as "dumb" as me. The joke about you guys is the moment i post stuff that supports Kundalini, you immediately scoff at it and explain it away as nonsense, as if you're above all these sources, even if they are sources from a Scientist. http://www.commonsensekundalini.com/science_spirituality/near_death_experience_and_k.html

 

Again, your idea of evidence is much lower than that of one who is logical.

 

I'm showing you that there are a few Scientists out there that are trying to study it. They must also lack any logic.

 

They may call themselves by that title.

 

so because they don't conform to your stubborness then that means they are no longer Scientists? Get over yourself.

 

Your assumptions are not bursting my reality bubble, but your fallacious attacks are showing greatly how your delusion is not being accepted.

 

Speaking of assumptions, you are assuming that a Scientist isn't one just because he's interested in studying NDE's and Kundalini.

 

If he can find evidence to support the claim, rather than trying to making the claim fit the hearsay, then they can be called scientists. I foresee no evidence forthcoming, however.

 

And I'm guessing that you also see the common description of NDE's as hearsay, correct?

 

NDEs have already been properly explained by science as hallucinations. What more are you seeking?

 

Almost dying isn't a hallucination. And if the experiences are all merely hallucinations, wouldn't they be different to each individual? How could they universally be similar?

 

And prior to it being proven the earth was round, it actually was flat?