Is The Uncertainty Principle Incompatible With Determinism?

A tomb is a crypt

you must learn how to speak

 

And if you speak to one who questions?!

Why should he realize that he is God? Will he be given superpowers? What if he doesn't want superpowers and is cool just being a man...then isn't he technically still being God without giving a damn whether he's God or not? What difference could it possibly make? Was God wrong to think himself a man all those years before he realized he was God? Then God was wrong about something, and God can't be wrong about something. So I feel it is quite senseless, quite senseless, indeed, to instruct people to believe they are God. But it may also be senseless to instruct people not to. Hrmrmrmrm

 

Man, there are alot of gods here. Which one are you?

 

What is the same is the same and what is different is different


who do you say

 

To see the truth is actually a matter of self esteem. It bears repeating. Self esteem.

It doesnt have to be reasonable or logical. Seeing is itself a sense metaphorically and otherwise so it is not senseless to see yourself as anything.

What would make you happy though, I think, and by saying this I am already out of my element and stumbling over my words. What would make you happy or at least aid you in your pursuit is if you stopped disagreeing. Try it out.

Instead of appreciate things that agree with you, what will happen is you appreciate all things. for what they truly are.

You will not have to try to stop judging because it will happen automatically.

dis·a·gree·ment:
noun
lack of consensus or approval.

What is it called when someone disagrees with themself? I believe the term is cognitive dissonance.

You are here, now, slow down and stop rushing to point B. Do not be confused about your senses. Do not be confused at all actually, there is no desception going on and you are understanding all of this correctly. How certain that this is true depends on what you see in yourself.

Because that is what you are looking at right now.

 

Doesn't bear repeating, bears a mouth washing.

Making true distinctions is a matter of comparison.

The only true distinction you can make is same or different.

There is no the truth. There are true stories. At one level a story is a true story by the comparison, that yes a story exists. All true comparisons within the story depend n the parameters that are within.

The ultimate starting point for axiomatic reasoning is reality.

There are no questions of authority only reality exists.

 

It should be reasonable and logical. You should take care for the soundness of other people's minds when you are espousing belief systems, I think. You are not taking any care for my peace of mind; you are trying to wreak confusion and uncertainty. I am not confused, nor do I disagree with myself. That has all been conjured in your own imagination for your own purposes. Not the good of the whole, but your own purposes.

 

I agree with your assessment

 

This reminds me that I never fully understood accounting.

 

You are starting to.

 

Thanks.

 

mY PEASURE YUARE SWEET

 

I'm a guy by the way. The girl in my avatar is just a pic I liked. Lol!

 

What appears to me is not sex but young

 

But thats just like, your opinion, man.

You do me too much honor to see what I wrote as an obstacle.

What I wrote was in response to you.

I think you deserve a share of the credit.

I think everyone deserves a share.

Then call me mother goose. My mother gooseries are good for the gander.

 

That's the spirit

 

Not if you are wrong

dummy

 

Why are you telling him anything when I have shown you to be mistaken. Righteousness is making correct distinctions.

 

No, that's a fact, if our goal is safe progression as a species, anyway. We shouldn't just blindly accuse people of lacking self-esteem and tell them that the problem is they are too moronic to understand that they are God.

Perhaps, at times, you do us all an injustice by not seeing what you are writing as an obstacle. There are more prosperous avenues of thought we could be engaging in rather than whether or not I personally am depressed or lack self-confidence. See, I find this type of response to be insidious, not helpful. Instead of arguing the points with me, you try and psychoanalyze me, as if it was your place to humble me. You can laugh to yourself like it's all a good time and I just don't understand it, because you perfectly must understand happiness because you are happy, but I am contended with who I am completely.

 

That is hardly a fact. We don't just sprout limbs hither nither and expect to mate. To control the evolution of the mind is to control the progress of the species. But look at what we are discussing here, controlling the evolution of the mind. Who is to say where the mind should go, really, other than to say it shouldn't go in a direction that confuses and belittles people.