Engineers should not have to reeducated themselves though.

So some of you have been whining that the costs for adjusting to alternative technologies requires the governments to step in, and that immediate profitability cannot be sensible for the private sector.

I believe that the money that was saved by the companies using nuclear technology at this point in time can be put into good use. But how can the investments be applied; stop thinking supply and demand. The projects are immense and instantly profitable. Forget the insurance companies. We need to apply the changed means of production to the companies we have; the government must raise taxes for the nuclear industry companies, and then they can cut-throat get out of business. It's simple the old buyers for these companies are switched to the same mass technology of electric distribution.

The sources of energy are afforded by government reinvestment. Environmentally developed coal might do fine too. And then finally we can move to developing chemically developed coal compounds. Engineering should go out demonstrating en masse for these new technologies. Engineers should not have to reeducated themselves though.

 

We suffer from too rich a diet, I don't think it is an engineering problem. We've near engineered ourselves out of house and home.

 

Well then: you're speaking about the house as Japan, and the home as the particular provinces there to be recognized for their democratic worth in deciding progress in the midst of Nature.