Does space continue

Zhyppers back soon.. but heres a hold over..

Sometimes science IS philosophy.Black holes are entirely a product of
speculation and observation of EFFECTS.
No black hole has ever been observed in human reality.
Stellar and biologic evolution was once a philosophy.
Not the processing by law we owe our existance to.
Enviromental harmony was once a 'philosophy'
Now. its a dire need.
The duration of reality is another such thing.
And i propose that people only say it must start or end is because
THEY start and end.
Reality applied to structures in it does not apply to the framework itself.
A stage may hold may plays. But in the end.. the stage remains.

occam

 

AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

 

I doubt that there is an end to space. Probably, there is an end to our universe, but beyond that there will be more space and more nothingness for infinity.

 

"Reality" is equal on all sides. Just like a bubble in the ocean.

If you're in the center, any direction you move in will appear straight.

Hmmm?



x

 

life

i think it bends around on itself.. like a klein bottle.
reality is not infinite in extension,, but is infinite in duration.
infinite extension is just too much.. but infinite duration i can fit in my head..sorta..lol
as python said.. 'i mean where does it all end?'

occam

 

Look into my sig.

There is no beginning or end.

Once it is sliced with reason, the beauty has been lost. It gets replaced by mind's fascination of it's own processes. This is when the cocoon closes around you. It's all you see, within the sphere.

Reality is then limited, as is anything you could build there to sense it with.

Because it all occurs within the center of this sphere.


x

 

xexon

lol
you the card...yes circles, the perfect shape..
but is it the shape of reality?
planets stars orbits galaxies.. all want to be circles.
but they are not.
earth is an oblate spheroid.
orbits end up as parabolas
stars are anything but perfect spheres
galaxies can be globular and as circular as a stepped on dohnut.


all try to be.[circles]. but trying dont cut it.

occam

In many situations relativistic effects can be neglected, and Newton's laws give a highly accurate description of the motion. Then the acceleration of each body is equal to the sum of the gravitational forces on it, divided by its mass, and the gravitational force between each pair of bodies is proportional to the product of their masses and decreases inversely with the square of the distance between them. To this Newtonian approximation, for a system of two point masses or spherical bodies, only influenced by their mutual gravitation (the two-body problem), the orbits can be exactly calculated. If the heavier body is much more massive than the smaller, as for a satellite or small moon orbiting a planet or for the Earth orbiting the Sun, it is accurate and convenient to describe the motion in a coordinate system that is centered on the heavier body, and we can say that the lighter body is in orbit around the heavier. (For the case where the masses of two bodies are comparable an exact Newtonian solution is still available, and qualitatively similar to the case of dissimilar masses, by centering the coordinate system on the center of mass of the two.)

the center of mass has always been my interest [aside from fuking my neighbours wife.. hehehe]

 

yuo guys might find this vid interesting. it explains and illustrates the 10 theoretical dimensions (we are capable of perceiving 4 of them right now):

http://youtube.com/watch?v=JkxieS-6WuA