thedopette: Ah, there you go, I can't touch that one! You told the truth! lol No, if you are truly those things to those people, you are those things in particular. Quite apart from the fact that words can be the things they describe, provided those things be words ( woody for instance is a very woody word ) it is you that is confused by them as symbols. Words can be made to mean things to the very hilt of their histories. If you are not an artist first and foremost in language, you will not understand this. You seem to though in your primal utterance on primal utterances. lol Likewise Anaximenes, with his speech about words emerging from a wording. Only possible explanation: everyone is such an artist! I love your thinking I need to reconcile my being an artist with my being my body. lol Must be because you're not me. Yes, you're none of me in particular! :-D You said the statement is no solution, not I. ∞ ≠ 1
Exactly and being as the future is modeled on the past we may create new meaning. I started a thread on it called the embodied origin of language and is something I talk about constantly visa vi symbols and their relationship to condition. Another possible explanation, we are a hydra head looking in many directions at once. Wise as a serpent yet innocent as a dove. So it is you argument. Correct infinity is a surreal number. You can't count it nor can you count on it for anything in particular. One is one, infinitely so.
To you. Why I asked if there was a problem. If I'm an argument, I resent you calling me one! Back to the statement: One is one. If it were infinitely one, one would equal infinity, which one doesn't. Divisibility.
well it's not a solution so it must be an argument for something Not equal does not a solution make. That is all.
I hope you know that a word is not an idea. It is the action of the left hemisphere of the brain distinct from the right. Thus the whole brain works in unisense with ideas. But what is the idea itself? Where does it come from? So as it becomes worded for the unified coordination of the true Idea from God, I guess; or at least from an fulfilled Ideal Consciousness in national Language; the emergent Word is as Substance. That is Synthesis at the power of Negation. All for One; I believe I wrote. One word created the universe. The word was light at this point. :2thumbsup:
Yes I understand. Thought word deed. I begin and end in the same place, face to face with my creator. Light is the light by which all things are seen. If the eye be sound the whole body will be full of light.
thedope: Ok, I'll think of a number, but only because I don't really resent your calling me an argument! lol Here you go. 7536 Anything you like. Anything you don't like too, though I'm not sure why you would. Anaximenes: Are you sure it's not more.? :-D What does it matter? It is the stillest words which bring the storm.
Well only god is good and if good be helpful it is a matter of timing and place if good be honest or consistent then yes.
Yes, outer space has particles moving around in nothingness which is not physical. You're mistaking physical objects with the area they're moving in.
Physicality is never confused with nothing. Find the measurement for zero for me and I'll vanish. Unlike infinity, zero can't even be inferred! lol I don't know, if you think you need the blankest of slates about, try quantum foam or something. No matter your ground state or zero-point energy, there's motion. What does your universal agent, god, want with nothingness? :-D
That way the nothing about the thesis precedes anything about the synthesis KNOWING THE PHYSICAL. But true synthesis is about the ideal universe with the PHYSICAL for nothing ultimately true. Why environmentalism was ultimately unessential to Ethics.:mickey:
You do exactly that in your infinity doesn't equal one equation. infty=infty+1 infty-infty=infty-infty+1 infty-infty=0 = infty-infty +1=1 0=1 Bye bye
God does not know Himself at infinity. At infinity, absolute knowledge, it is all about humanity in it's distinct places and forms of worship knowing God. God surely did and does know Himself at wholly Finity. (faux pas: according to the Mac Speller)
lol! No. But give the man a crayon! Anaximenes: Muck spiller nods no bot the leaven gourd bin dine for one.
Yeah, the mind has a hard time with it. There are no thoughts you can attach to it so you are left with no thought, but it still is.