Nice bait and switch there, but it was "no justification for restricting pistol grips on rifles".
It means that the will of the majority is irrelevant when it comes to their desire to violate civil liberties. When the disagreement centers on...
Because it is the big issue. Banning pistol grips on rifles is the centerpiece of the left's gun control efforts. Correct. The left has no...
The left's push for gun control centers around trying to ban pistol grips on rifles.
If a law is changed, any restrictions on guns in that law still have to be justified as serving a compelling government interest.
Save time. Episodes 1 through 6 at the same time superimposed on top of each other: Star Wars Wars - All Star Wars at Once :sunglasses:
No disingenuousness. If the reason for banning pistol grips on rifles is anything other than the joy of violating people's civil liberties, then...
That means fearing everyone who supports the Constitution. Civil liberties always trump the will of the majority in the United States. Gun...
Is it because our civil liberties are vital to our freedom?
That is incorrect. The Right to Keep and Bear Arms guarantees me the right to anything that there is no compelling government interest in...
Because we dislike having our civil liberties violated.
That is the chronology of how events happened within the fictional universe, but there are reasons to not view the movies in that order. Episodes...
Modernization is good.
Given the limitations on firing rate imposed by a semi-auto action, what degree of improvement in rapid firing is brought about by having a pistol...
An adjustable stock is an improvement over a stock that is not adjustable. Adjustable stocks do not cause an appreciable difference in the...
I question whether there will be any difference in accuracy. The only difference that I can see is that a pistol grip allows for a modern stock...
That is preposterous. How does a pistol grip on a rifle make killing in any way more efficient? How would outlawing pistol grips on rifles make...
No. No one thinks anything that ridiculous. There is no other possible reason for trying to outlaw pistol grips on rifles. It is proper that...
Why would I be proud? Or ashamed? Or any other emotion associated with ownership? I am not responsible for these suicides.
If the goal of "outlawing pistol grips on rifles" is anything other than "a desire to violate civil liberties for fun" then what is that...
Separate names with a comma.
