Proof is the universally accepted version of it. Empirical evidence. Science being able to test it again and again, according to the scientific...
Hey, it's not a scientific practice if no proof is involved. All I saw and read was mere personal accounts. That is not proof. That does not...
Again, I am not seeing proof. One can claim anything, but without the proof to back it up, it is meaningless. All I logically see is religiously...
No, just the ones that have been revealed through the media as fakes. Provide a link of an atheist who had a NDE and suddenly became religious....
How so? Simply stating it does not make it thus.
Monetary gain. It's already been a popular spiel revealed. Appeal to the masses with what they want to accept and earn your money.
Indeed, it was. To the logical mind, it was flat until it could be proven that it was round. But then again, was it not the illogical minds that...
In a world dominated by a fictitious account of the afterlife, do you honestly expect people to hallucinate something other than what they have...
NDEs have already been properly explained by science as hallucinations. What more are you seeking?
If he can find evidence to support the claim, rather than trying to making the claim fit the hearsay, then they can be called scientists. I...
Your assumptions are not bursting my reality bubble, but your fallacious attacks are showing greatly how your delusion is not being accepted.
They may call themselves by that title.
Again, your idea of evidence is much lower than that of one who is logical.
They're called ghost hunters, and they haven't found any proof.
Really? How is science supposed to test that which cannot be perceived in any way except to blindly ignore reason and accept upon mere faith...
Scientists are smart enough to not study it. What is so hard to understand about that?
You clearly have a misunderstanding of what evidence means and entails. If every logical being took you for your mere word that what you spew is...
After all, being able to accept anything as real without the proof to support it is not open-mindedness. It is mere susceptibility.
You have yet to show it.
Until such proof can be shown that other intelligent life in the universe exists, I will disbelieve in the existence of it. That is only logical....
Separate names with a comma.
