Jump to content


Click to shop at FS Books
Photo
- - - - -

Why Is Art Important?




  • Please log in to reply
117 replies to this topic

#31 Laci

Laci

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 509 posts
  • LocationIn the closet

Posted November 16 2014 - 06:04 PM

You asked what was more important to me: science or art. 

 

I think they're equally important. If someone finds something to be beautiful, makes them happy, and allows them to express themselves without harming myself or others.....let it be. 



#32 Karen J

Karen J

    ~

  • Banned
  • PipPipPip
  • 6,961 posts
  • Locationthe unmentionable state

Posted November 16 2014 - 08:54 PM

Art is a mental, emotional, spiritual, and psychological journey that takes a lifetime to experience.  Nobody can explain it well in a few paragraphs.

 

What do you think is more valuable, art or science?

 

They are not in competition.


Life is short. Try to spend most of it on the good stuff.

#33 Moonglow181

Moonglow181

    Lifetime Supporter

  • Lifetime Supporter 
  • PipPipPip
  • 14,650 posts

Posted November 16 2014 - 08:55 PM

nor should they be in competition.....:)



#34 IRQ42

IRQ42

    Scientia Potentia Est

  • Banned
  • PipPipPip
  • 8,034 posts
  • Locationsegmentation fault

Posted November 16 2014 - 09:37 PM

OP: you say you are a "science guy" ... i've always noticed that certain "technical" things, such as writing software code and certain other types of engineering are both art and a science. such things require you to use both sides of your brain, the technical logical side, and the creative artsy side at the same time. think about it, coding software surely requires quite a bit of specific technical knowlege about machines, the nature of the architecture/environment, logic, etc .. but it also requires a lot of creativity too, the ability to come up with something completely new to solve a particular problem. often there can be many ways to solve a particular problem, not just one, so there is lots of flexibility there.


  • NoxiousGas likes this
"Real programmers use a magnetized needle and a steady hand"

In order to understand recursion you must first understand recursion ...

If programmers deserve to be rewarded for creating innovative
programs, by the same token they deserve to be punished if they
restrict the use of these programs.
-- Richard Stallman


https://github.com/IRQ42/
Posted Image

#35 RooRshack

RooRshack

    On Sabbatical

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 11,112 posts

Posted November 16 2014 - 10:13 PM

OP: you say you are a "science guy" ... i've always noticed that certain "technical" things, such as writing software code and certain other types of engineering are both art and a science. such things require you to use both sides of your brain, the technical logical side, and the creative artsy side at the same time. think about it, coding software surely requires quite a bit of specific technical knowlege about machines, the nature of the architecture/environment, logic, etc .. but it also requires a lot of creativity too, the ability to come up with something completely new to solve a particular problem. often there can be many ways to solve a particular problem, not just one, so there is lots of flexibility there.

To build on that:

 

Consider the inherent beauty of some logic or logical systems - art is (at least part of it, or it can be) when you take the beauty and separate it, and abandon logical rules that might handicap it, and build beauty for the sake of beauty.

 

The problem is that I'm not sure you understand beauty in the same way I do, or that it can exist as more than a vague logical concept to you - see my previous post about taking acid.


Edited by RooRshack, November 16 2014 - 10:15 PM.

RIP cosmoknot.

 

image.php?u=191931&type=sigpic&dateline=

 

 

 

Missing at ocala: A true feminist, rumored to be traveling with bigfoot and a man of impeccable scottish credentials.


#36 RichardTheFrog

RichardTheFrog

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 671 posts

Posted November 17 2014 - 02:13 AM

I've done acid about 1000 times.

 

Yea the Eiffel Tower. Another good example of science meeting art. The Pyramids, so many other examples as well...



#37 IamnotaMan I AM THOR

IamnotaMan I AM THOR

    I am Thor. On sabba-tickle. Still available via usual channels.

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 6,518 posts

Posted November 17 2014 - 03:59 AM

Why is art important?

 

I'm a science guy.

 

I read history books and when it comes to the art section of each chapter, I don't entirely see the point.

 

Gothic cathedrals, Michaelangelo, architecture, Shakespeare, etc.

 

How is this relevant and important?

 

I'm not saying that it's not. I am just asking if there is something that I'm missing.

The saying is "the art of the science, and the science of the art".

Leonardo da Vinci, Lewis Carroll, Francis Bacon and many others did both.

And found one reinforced their understanding of the other.

 

I think the pt is that you should only bother with art that means something to you.

Only idiots pretend they like something because others tell them to.

 

I mean Reubens is all about some fat woman surrounded by naked 3 yr old boys. I mean that is WEIRRRRRD to me. However, its actually all about symbolism and stuff, so should mean something to someone who has read up on all the classical mythology and politics/concept of beauty in  the era it was painted. I still think its shit tho.

 

Even the most purely scientific person can appreciate art. I'm sure he listens to music, has opinions on the type of house he likes to live in, the decoration of a home/restaurant/bar. He probably has favourite films, MAYBE likes certain photos/paintings in his home.

 

And what is considered art changes over time. Shakespeare was not considered to be a great writer early on, and many great painters died without ever getting fame or fortune. If you like how something looks/reads/sounds then that is art to you. Don't say how wonderful something is, when you really think it looks shite. Thats what makes art look ridiculous.


150px-Ribbon_of_Saint_George.svg.png
 Родина-мать зовёт!

 

          Ever get bored of BS?


#38 RichardTheFrog

RichardTheFrog

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 671 posts

Posted November 17 2014 - 04:09 AM

I don't like any music. I used to be into it when I was younger. I used to play Jimi Hendrix solos behind my back with a wa pedal, etc. 

 

I just grew out of it. I don't watch television. I don't watch movies. I don't read fiction.

 

I do appreciate home decorations. If I had the money to do so, I would decorate with some sort of anthropology, tribal things like African masks and Amazon stuff and things of that nature.

 

I also like visually pleasing air-fresheners that only cost $1.



#39 tonydoe420

tonydoe420

    Member

  • Banned
  • PipPip
  • 262 posts

Posted November 17 2014 - 05:40 AM

It's important because it is a manifestation of freedom. 


The freedom to exprees, the freedom to choose. 

the messages can be infinatly varied like the people who look at art, but they share this in common. 

You could go into how people use art, and their motivations for why they need a specific kind of art, but that is the surface symptom of the need to have choice. 

In some societies, choice is everywhere so art has less meaning in the context of their lives. Others have very little choice and art is one of the few ways someone can communicate with themselves or others. 

All of this viewing, collecting and choosing art is as manifestation of expression which is freedom of choice.
  • Art is used as a metaphor for so many things that we can't or don't want to express literally. Metaphor and literality are equal and opposite so we need as many metaphors as literal expressions ergo art is necessary to balance the literal in the world.

  • Moonglow181 likes this

"Don’t walk behind me; I may not lead. Don’t walk in front of me; I may not follow. Just walk beside me and be my friend."

Albert Camus


#40 RichardTheFrog

RichardTheFrog

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 671 posts

Posted November 17 2014 - 05:47 AM

Not all artists are free. What about the Jewish prisoners who were forced to counterfeit money in the concentration camps.

 

Hitler was an artist. Look at him.

 

Really makes you think, doesn't it?

 

I think I heard that Leonardo da Vinci was secretly a child molester. I can't entirely account for the accuracy of that. I think I saw in on the History Channel. Or maybe I just made it up. I'm not sure.






Click to shop at Royal Queen Seeds