in my opinion it s not bush s fault for the war in iraq .every american president is controled by others.the capital is the real administrator of the us foreign affairs so dont just blame bush blame capitalism.See what the democrat president did to yugoslavia?
bush has fucked up every single decision hes ever made he may not be 100% at failt, but is the driving force behind all the insanity he's a criminal..and should be treatted as such i'm not sure if he should be tried for treason however, or confined to a mental hospitol for life
Bush is a criminal and an idiot all right, but I really think that Dick Cheney is responsible for the War ON Iraq. Bush is a puppet, and Dick pulls the strings. Dick Cheney is kind of an evil genius (as in he has a lot of clever ways to be evil). Bush is just an evil dumbass.
A lot of nonsense you're all spouting. Yes, he is a bad president, and I don't like him being in office. But, he is not, by far, the worst president EVER. I suppose he's doing the best he can. He is from Texas. 90% of that poplation believes in "If you kill someone, we will kill you back." He's raising the country the way he was raised. He will be gone in 2 years. Have your pokes at his ignorance. Because he can't pronounce half the shit he spews. But, all in all, he isn't the most evil, horrifying human being on the face of the earth. He's just as responsible as the next person in politics when it comes to the War on Terrorism. He had to present the idea. And, he sure isn't showing any signs of backing out....not that I've heard lately, anyway.
My opinion on dubya? I think he's a fairly good guy with good intentions... I mean, he grew up in a family of hawks in Texas, as Meg said. I mean, the things he says and does are really not that surprising. I think he's really confused, desperate, and taking alot of blows at this point in time. I kinda felt sorry for him today while I was listening to NPR. He's just a guy I would rather have live across the street from me than be my president, you know. I am glad that Rumsfeld finally resigned and thought he was trying to just keep his job as long as he could and respect that he did what was in the best interests of a country that can have a major effect on the entire world and their opinions about us, as we all know. I'm sure many of the Republicans are tired of getting the Village Idiot kind of responses just because of their party affiliation, even if they do not side with President Bush. But... having grown up in the Commonwealth of Virginia and what I'd consider the capital of today's new South, along with Atlanta, Georgia, I feel that George Allen is an overrated candidate and a bit of an extremist and complete douchebag. If he is elected president in 2008, I will no longer be residing in this country. I sincerely appologize to all Macacans of the world of my Commonwealth's senator's actions... :nopity: Though, personally, even though I would most likely not support gay marraige, I believe that the Vote Yes For Marraige thing is complete bogus which is only there to prevent unmarried couples from recieving any kind of gov't support, funding, or liberties... visitation rights (hospitals, etc.), and things of that sort. *Cough*Bullshit*Cough*
i think the problem is people not accepting gays for who they are and so because bush represses his gay feelings and love for saddam hussein, it comes out as this rage of war and destruction
Here is a top secret photograph of President Bush eating a poor kitten. The Pentagon has obstructed evidence from us in the past, though the Democratic party shall prevail in the name of Allah and the jewish-run media.
I accept them as who they are. I just feel that they shouldn't recieve the same benefits and should be recognized differently than traditional married couples.
Shouldn't recieve the same benefits? Pardon my French, but what the fuck is wrong with you? Your saying that you accept them, you just don't accept them as human beings. Reality Check: THEY WERE BORN GAY - not giving them the same benefits because of the way the were born (note how they didn't have a choice) is the same as saying interracial couples can't get married, or some other bullshit like that.
No... re-read my statement. I accept them, I just don't accept them traditional married couples. In fact, I have several friends that are gay and they have no real problem with my opinion... in fact, I have a teacher who is a homosexual and had the same stance as I. Though, due to hellbent questions such as Yes to Marraige and all of that mess, I would have voted No... as unmarried couples would not have equal rights. Let's face it, you live in New York, and I live in Virginia. We're not going to agree, but we both want some form of peace...
Yeah, why single them out? If gay couples are happy staying unmarried (I know I would be) then that'f fine, but you're sayig we sould deprive the others of that choice. The "traditional" married couple thing comes from the Bible. That may be fine for you, but I thought we had freedom of religion on this country.
Their children wouldn't be born or related to both parents by blood, I don't personally believe in divorce unless it is due to physical abuse. We do have freedom of religion. It's just that I also have an overlapping freedom of speech and so do they, you, and everyone else. You could say I'm wrong in depriving others of that choice, though I'm looking at it as that I'm depriving myself of that choice as it's against my beliefs. Otherwise, it's not a large issue to me and I really can't help being raised the way I am... maybe one day, things will change, but until then, I'm sticking with the majority. The thing I can't stand are the people who refer to inatimate objects or random crap as gay and make personal attacks on homosexuals.