For the past five minutes of this ridiculous debate, all I have heard is these two clowns arguing over who is more pro-war. Sure, Obama wants to get the troops out of Iraq.... so he can send them all over to Afghanistan to be killed there. So I guess that is what "change" means.
The difference is I don’t trust the Manchurian candidate to be, John McCain (Raymond Shaw) along with his handler Sarah Palin (Mrs. Iselin) Hotwater
my thoughts....i am more for obama than mccain.... still, rhetoric is a very old artform, and should be looked at as nothing more than that. an artform. it is EXTREMELY limited in terms of being a method of looking into the soul of a politician and what he or she will actually do in office. i'm not saying here that either mccain or obama will be the better choice. thats all personal opinion. i have mine, but do not think its even relevant to the debates. i'm curious matt, do you intend to vote at all? i do not condemn you if you don't, i'm just curious. but like i said, rhetoric is an artform and nothing else......and debate is a particularly structured format for the artform of rhetoric. i really think it has less to do with the behavior of the candidate or the opinions of the candidate than it has to do with their ability to pander to the masses. i dont even really bother to follow the debates, to be quite honest. perhaps that's irresponsible. i don't really even know anymore.
I’m guessing he’ll probably vote for some third party candidate reject that no one gives a shit about Hotwater
i've considered voting third party myself. i just dont think its a very good election for it. back in 2000 i think it was a good election to vote third party. this year, its an impossibility, as usual.
Most of the psychopaths who are politicians don't even need pills. They have the ability to rationalize whatever they say and do, which is what makes them psychopaths.