No surprises where the story came from: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...tics-warn-teachers-interfere-childs-play.html I am happy to inform you chaps that UK schools did not ban best friends. Do people actually believe this? [Thanks Deviate] https://twitter.com/LOLatLiberals
It was on a facebook page. Approx 200 people DO think it is true... Davy Goossens: this has everything to do with leftism, anyone thinking otherwise doesnt know where the idea of state education comes form and how leftist all the teachers are! good luck finding conservative or libertarian teachers! Dudley Luntsford: Communists!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I've fallen for stupid shit on the internet before. Luckily I read into stuff more rather than just take it at face value.
Even if they brought that out it wouldn't work. Children have best friends because they form relationships, not because they 'have' to and it would be pretty impossible to stop children forming bonds through interests and play, it just happens, and it doesn't happen to everyone either. My dad is 52 and all his friends are ones he made either in primary or secondary school. Bloody dailymail! They also posted something a while back about how breastfeeding is gross and primitive..
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5eBT6OSr1TI Daily Mail's a pile of wank, but at least this kind of wank isn't as harmful as some of their shite, like this: http://action.sumofus.org/a/daily-mail-littlejohn-lucy-meadows/?sub=fb
Devils advocate: Which article do you mean? This is an article I found: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1198433/Why-breastfeeding-STILL-taboo.html I do think the Daily Mail gets lambasted for comments made by contributing writers, and it is not what the paper might feel as a whole. It can not be denied that The Daily Mail thrives on one end of the spectrum, and has contributing writers who have a distinct lack of even handedness. This could be said with almost all newspapers. It is easy enough to characterise a newspaper in a particular way - but we must have the same diligence we might have for other media for what was actually said to what others imply. Only this week we can see that most of the newspapers are implying Cameron is taking a hard line against immigrants. Is that fair? Truth be told, politicians play the same game as the media. Bottom line, if you are going to speak about a particular article - read it in full, and be fair...and also acknowledge who said it. Littlejohn is a big time ___ AND A _____ OF THE FIRST ORDER.
I found this more interesting: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...tunt-famous-YouTube.html?ICO=most_read_module The first person video gave me an intense desire to do it. But I would want two ropes..... I find one anchor unacceptable for normal climbing, so swinging hundreds of feet, as the rope binds on rock? Yeah, I'll take two... and elementary math, too
Crazy, I was watching videos of that the other day. I was wondering if anybody had ever been hurt. I don't think there is any way in hell I would ever do that but it does look fun.
I would hope they use webbing around the arch. But who knows. I can't believe someone miscalculated the length, just wow..
You posted this: http://www.hipforums.com/newforums/showpost.php?p=7599891&postcount=424 Which contained this: https://www.************/l.php?u=http://goo.gl/1YZQ9&h=BAQHLvt_j&s=1 Which had the OP within it.
Here is the list in Facebook, http://goo.gl/1YZQ9 compiled by my new friend, Nanette White, who publishes Michigan's News & Views. Below it, we re-publish the Gary Franchi interview with Dr. Jim Garrow, of January 23rd, which attests to key military officers being asked whether or not they will fire on U.S. Citizens who refuse to give up their firearms. If you click on Nanette White's Timeline - the story is on her Timeline. I thank you for posting this story in a very, very indirect way. Atleast leading me to find it.
The story about best friends in the UK? And why post people's names on here man.. Geez you really should be some kind of private investigator.
Yes. They have posted their comments in an open forum. It isn't like anybody here is going to harass them for leaning towards that way of thinking is it?
