TRUCE!!! Atheists and Christians need to get along. Seriously this is bullshit. I made a thread back in April and it's still going on. Given enough interested people, that thread will never end. This WAR will never end. There will always be believers and non-believers. GIVE IT A REST! I mean holy shit, I come back here in October and my thread is still going on, and here's what the last 20 pages looked like: "God's real" "Noh Uh" "Yuh huh" "I can prove it" "Ok go ahead" "THATS NOT PROOF!" "Yuh huh" "Noh uh" And so on. Holy crap it will go on forever. Learn to be tolorant and not be such dicks to people who believe something different than you. Stop posting pointless trash. Leave that to people like Richard Dawkins and whoever decides to debate him. So how about until this whole thing is finally decided, let's have you go your way and I'll go mine.
Well, this is the Agnosticism/Atheism forum, if christians want to talk about god, why don't they do it in the christianity forum?
because athiesm isn't so much a system of beliefs as a reaction to a system of beliefs. it isn't self supporting, it needs a god, or atleast an idea of a god, to not believe in. and to the op: JIHAD!
Exactly, religion can not be ignored or tolerated any more than AIDS. Religion is a deadly disease! The "religious right" will always lead you down the wrong path. The religious vote has nearly destroyed America. When the majority finally realize that religion is a sickness there will be no more "freedom of religion", there will be freedom FROM religion. There will not even be any hope of peace until this day comes.
I can accept the fact that the God Atheists do not believe in does not exist, but Atheists should consider the idea that non-Atheists may be talking about something entirely different than the non-existent, non-object of their Atheistic disbelief. To put it more simply, the only thing common to both the Atheist's God and the Non-Atheist's God, is the name. When speaking about God, Atheists and Non-Atheists are rarely, if ever, engaged in the same conversation. It's kind of like a Doctor and a Mystic talking about Consciousness, or a Rabbi and a Guitarist talking about Inspiration, or a Biologist and a Biographer talking about Life. Peace and Love
In his book Atheism: A Very Short Introduction, Julian Baggini makes a good case that atheism is usually another name for naturalism, and that instead of just being negative and against god, it's really a positive belief system favoring naturalistic explanations. I think a similar case could be made that other forms of atheism are essentially humanist. As I understand it, the American Humanists are trying to provide atheists the "benefits" of organized religion.
Varuna: But they should consider?! lol You should be hoping we don't! And to put it even more simply, atheists do it better! When speaking about god, atheists stutter AND slobber less than non-atheists. Kind of, but not really. Always, which is why humans won't give a fuck about religion in the end! Mark my words!
Get a backbone. Tolorate difference instead of talking about eliminating it. What you just said may be the most arrogant paragraph I've ever read. Peace will come when people like you learn that not everyone will conform to your ideas. The title of the thread was Truce, and you had to have your little go at religion. If you really hate religion that much, then go cry about it. Your the only Atheist who has to be a dick in every single post. Ease up for once, and relax. The point of this thread is to offer a truce between Atheists and Beleivers. The mystery can ONLY be solved after death, so until then, let's BOTH keep our mouths closed.
I’m sorry but I am not going to shut my mouth about a disease that has killed billions, oppressed more billions and is likely to destroy mankind.
Like many Atheists, you have missed the point . . . again!!! You believe religion is bad because believers commit acts of ignorance, oppression and violence. This is a problem. Humans were wrestling with ignorance, oppression and violence before we were even human. But, rather than address the issue of ignorance, oppression and violence, you blame all organized intentions (however unsuccessful) to enlighten, liberate and make peace. Let's play with your analogy. According to your logic: If A is bad, and A and B co-exist, therefore, B is bad. Your solution? Get rid of B and A will cease to exist. According to your logic: AIDS is a medical condition that kills people, it is bad. Medicine has not eradicated AIDS, therefore, medicine is complicit (this is exactly the same fallacy as the relationship between religion and ignorance, oppression and violence). Abolish medical science and AIDS will just go away. Let me guess, you've never studied medicine, or religion, or . . . logic. Here's to your enlightenment, liberation and peace. Peace and Love
And guns don't kill people either… And right wing voters didn't support an unjust war that killed thousands… And Hitler didn't use religion to slaughter millions… And if the pope says jerking off is murdering souls then every man is going to hell… It is YOU who have totally missed the point. Connect the dots. Or are you genetically blocked by the breeding and genocides of billions to mentally do so? I thought so! Man will never escape his ignorance as log as religion exist because religion relies on ignorance. Religion not only depends on ignorance for control but breeds it. It absolutely, positively, fundamentally breeds ignorance and it fucking breeds it well!!
They do, but that is NOT what we are talking about. They did. They were ignorant of their professed ideals and were misled by those who claimed to know something they didn't . . . but that is ALSO not what we are talking about. He had nothing to do with religion. He killed six million people and violated everything Holy because he was at least as ignorant about Judaism (and Christianity) as you seem to be. You should know your story before you start fighting about it. Otherwise, how are you any better than those you compare yourself to? And if you say that is all there is to be ignorant of, then we may as well be arguing about the Symbiotics of Proto-Indo-European Etymology . . . and yes, that is STILL not what we are talking about. Ooh!!! A personal attack. You have either run out of ideas, or you want to change the rules of our little conversation so that I will treat you like the idiot you mistake me for. Either way, you may want to think again about your limitations before you pick a fight with anyone you don't fully know. Ignorance of what? What do you think everyone else should know? Why do you think you know the "big picture"? Believe it or not, we understand the same thing a little differently, but ultimately, I agree with you, it is unwise to base your religious beliefs on ignorance. Let's transcend this ignorance. I am curious to know your insights into the essential nature of reality. Please share your enlightenment. The simple truth is, you control yourself, or you don't. The more you know, the more you realize, ignorance is not control, ignorance is whatever lies beyond your ability to think and feel. You will never know what it is until you learn to see it, yourself. Peace and Love (believe it or not)
stop being such a little bitch and pulling your argument straight out of your ass. Religion has held mankind together for countless centuries. What kept the Roman empire so united? Religion. Why is there so much amazing architechture in India? Religion. yes, religions have their quarrels, some resulting in death or war. what I love about you is YOUR IGNORANCE of bringing up only the bad things about religion. And while we're on the topic, religion doesnt kill people, people kill people. "Likely to destroy mankind" LMAO! Religion is the only reason mankind is still alive today, and is as advanced as we are today. You entire argument=shit.
"""Ooh!!! A personal attack. You have either run out of ideas, or you want to change the rules of our little conversation so that I will treat you like the idiot you mistake me for. Either way, you may want to think again about your limitations before you pick a fight with anyone you don't fully know. """ LMFAO!! Personal attacks are just crap added onto an unstable argument when the poster runs out of effective ideas. I couldnt have worded it better myself.
That's a bold one, considering how many times I've beaten the daylights out of your silly arguments and theories! “Let me guess, you've never studied medicine, or religion, or . . . logic.” Now let me guess, oh wait, I don't give a fuck who you are. All I know is your STUPID post makes about as much sense and Elizabeth Fucking Hasselbeck explaining the Iraq war. And that wasn’t a personal attack or shot at my intelligence? Take your truce and shove it your ass. And after you’re done getting off on that one, look up the Country with the shortest life expectancy and tell me that the fact they have a BIBLE and a GUN on their flag is COMPLETELY fucking coincidental.
hhmmm...this is an interesting thread indeed...but i think it may be time to change the title... :huh:
LMAO!! This just keeps getting better! Relaxxx bud, you have taken arrogance to a whole new level, congrats. This is what we get when Atheists lose their argument. Relaxxx, your argument sucks, your grammer is shit, and it's become oh so obvious now that you don't have a leg to stand on in a real discussion. You resort to personal insults instead of actually attempting to rebute my argument. And just a little add-on, you haven't once, ONCE, beating anything out of me. If you believing me to be wrong counts in your head as 'beating the daylights out of me' than ok. I'll let you have that one. Be proud of yourself.