The Moon Landings Were A Hoax!!:

'THE EAGLE NEVER LANDED!".

It was grounded in Area 51 of the Nevada Desert.

The Moon Landings were an elaborate hoax devised by NASA & President Nixon to get one up on the Soviets during the Cold War/Space Race.

Why do you think that the Russians abandoned the race in the mid-sixties?;- because they knew it was impossible to land a man on the moon.

The Moon is a Star that gives off Radiation.The radiation alone is enough to kill a man.No man can cross the 'Van Allen Belt' without a risk of developing cancer.

The photos of Man on the Moon don't show any stars in the sky.Why not?-the reason is simple- that would prove to Astronomers that the photo was taken on Planet Earth- due to the geographical location of the stars.

The video-film shows the Astronauts leaping in 'slow-motion' due to no gravity.When the film is speeded up - they are walking normally!.

The same film of the July 1969 Apollo 11 Moon Landings shows the American Flag blowing in the wind on the Moon.
The Moon has no atmosphere;- how can the flag be waving to & fro?.

NASA has never seen any reason to deny these accusations.Isn't it about time that It did?.




Where are the Stars in the Sky?...........

 

Oh man, not this crap again. I think that you need to change your name to "Flight from reason and sanity".

1. The moon is not a star, the sun is a star. I really don't mean to sound rude but that is one of the stupidest things that I have ever read, it ranks right up there with flat earth crap.

2. There are no stars because the lighting equipment used by the astronuats washed out the stars. Furthermore, the stars look exactly the same from the moon as from the earth. In fact the satrs are far enough away that to the unaided eye they would look the same from Alpha Centauri as from earth.

3. The flag is not blowing, my god use your brain! It doesn't even look like it is blowing. It is sticking straight out, like it was stiffened with wires. Not surprising since it was stiffened with wires so that it would not hang down all limp and look stupid.

4. If you doctor up the film you can make it look like the astronuats were walking!? All that this proves is the the film can be doctored up by conspiracy nuts. This does not explain how they were able to jump 15 feet in the air while wearing 100 pounds of equipment. Maybe the government invented anti gravity equipment.

4. Nasa has not denied these allegations because it would be a waste of time. It would make about as much sense as the army responding to Godzilla sightings.

 

i believe you, flight from ashiya
professor jumbo, you didnt state enough facts to sway me.lol

 

I herd about that a few years back!

 

Mm the idea of moon landings being a hoax has always seemed pretty valid to me. But I don't really know enough of the facts to make a judgement... To be competely honest it doesn't really bother me one way or another, I mean, what's so great about flying for a bit and then landing on some big rock then coming back again? If they'd made contact with another civilisation and learned new stuff, then yeah, its all good, but I don't see what's so amazing about just saying "We're so good, we can put our pretty little flag on a natural satellite and pretend to ourselves that it belongs to us". But maybe there is something amazing about it and I'm missing the point entirely. Sorry, feeling slightly jaded right now.

 

hahahahahahahhahaha, thanks for the visual!!!!!

 

g.........i..........a.....n..................tsteps are what you make walking on the moon ROXANN you dont have to put on the red light.....................am sending out an SOS ...................soz guys just had a police attact.

 

actually, while I have never been to AREA 51, I have spent a fair amount of time at Nellis AFB, where area51 is a tiny speck of the nellis ranges, and it looks nothing like that photo. that first statement alone reminds me of AUstin Powers pointing out how Rural england looks in no way like SOuthern California, even when its obvious he is on highway 30 on the way to big bear......and before you point out that I have never been to England, I have also never been to the moon but I have either visited or seen pictures of all the locations mentioned in this rant I just typed. 'cept the actual couple hundred acres that is one the most highly gaurded spaces in AMerica. thats where they shoulda sent them Gauntanmo Bay detainees.

 

Nothing that Professor Jumbo stated has convinced me that the Moon Landings were real.


What is to stop NASA from issuing a denial of the accusation?.

Has anyone seen the Film: 'Capricorn One'?.

Then you'd see what I'm getting at.

If you don't hear from me ,now; it is because I have been bumped off by the C.I.A.!!...............

 

Must be, because Apollo 13 never landed on the moon. "Houston, we've had a problem" and all that....

BTW, Apollo 13 was launched in 1970, not 1969.

Now if you meant Apollo 11, the theories about it being faked have been thoroughly debunked at:

http://www.badastronomy.com

 

The moon is not a "star that gives off radiation"... Actually many arguments against the possibility of there being a moon landing talk about it being dangerous to travel through the Van Allen Belt - a zone of high intensity particle radiation trapped in the Earth's magnetic field. The space shuttle in orbit is below the Van Allen Belt, but once you travel deeper into space you hit it and expose yourself to this massive radiation. Some have claimed that travelling through the Van Allen Belt to reach the moon would prove fatal to astronauts.

This chestnut has been around for decades ... if you're going to regurgitate it, at least get it right!

 

Sorry- I meant Apollo 11; - & all the subsequent Apollo missions that landed on the Moon.(Supposedly).

 

Yes - you are quite right; I meant the radiation given off by the 'Van Allen Belt' - I apologise again-this is what happens when you rush to post up a topic!!.

 

the point of doing it is that we could - so that we could do it and then step back and realise not just what we have done, but also what we are capable of. someone once asked sir edmund hillary (first man to scale everest) why he wanted to do it, and he replied 'because it's there.'

on the moon landing, i have never believed it was a hoax. i often feel that those who do just dont have enough faith in their own species. realise our potential, dont deny every great achievement we have made. feckin conspiracy freaks.

 

bullshit. he/she corrected you and you googled it to see if it fit your quack theory. you my friend need to buy this venitian palace I personally had mooved to York from me. I swear I will trade it for a cask of Taddy Porter.

 

You're all wrong. I believe it is called the Van Halen belt. Google that and you will learn that the moon landing was indeed a hoax perpetrated by a certain 80s metal hair band who had some belts and harnesses left over from their "Panama" video, so they sold it to NASA who then hired Stanley Kubrick to stage the whole thing. I mean, jeez, do a little research, people.

 

OJ shot Tupac and Biggie Smalls

 

Lol:-The'Van Halen' Belt & O.J. as well,I like it!.
..........Take a look at this official NASA photo:
where are the Stars????.........there has to be the same stars out there that we see on Earth.

 

Who really cares. Space is a waste of time and money! Damn we could fix the social security system will all that money we have wasted. Or at the very least join the rest of the 1st world nation is providing health care for everyone!

 

Well h we have gotten velcroe and tang out of NASA!