Signature pix..ugh

I don't think it was a good idea to ever allow pictures in a signature. I suppose your name or a quote is alright, but sometimes that is even annoying. I've yet to see any awesome signature photos. They're usually huge photos and usually annoying as hell, some are even gross. Why do I want to see your annoying signature pic posted over..and over...and over again???

 

wahh wahhh :bigcry:

 

yeah, why would I wanna see john goodman so many times? Buscemi is alright, but goodman? no thanks

 

you can turn off signatures

 

really? how??

 

I am glad I don't have to see the blonde chick in your sig anymore
Although I don't really mind sig pics, and this is not an issue to me.

 

ha ha I had that for like 2 days
But then it started annoying me so I took it off
It was the morton salt girl..I was just trying to find something that kinda represented myself
But it turned out to be too large for my taste

 

I can't decide if I find him more annoying as his character Dan in Roseanne (roseanne is pretty much my favorite tv show btw) or if I find him more annoying playing other characters outside of Roseanne..
hmmm

 

I guess he makes me kind of anxious when I'm watching him on screen with his breathing. I just wanna say, "have a seat big guy or you're gonna give yourself a heart attack.."

 

User CP/ settings & options/ edit options/ visible post elements

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GPo9OBrIOi4"]I DONT ROLL ON SHABBOS! - YouTube

 

^yeah if someone has a HUGE pic, shouldn't it get deleted since their are rules about the size??

 

The people who have cool ones make up for the stupid ones most of the time

 

people who underquote annoy me more than useless sig pics

 

underquote? I think sometimes that's needed though so the person knows you're referencing/replying to them....I guess you could just write @username though, but quoting seems easier

 

thanks!!!
:hug:

 

it annoying because then you have to look back

 

or you can quote it regularly...