I'm confused by the privilege against self-incrimination in the US. The Fifth Amendment has guarateed it since George Washington's time. But the police can still interrogate you. If you have the right to remain silent why do they even interrogate you? They say they can if they give you your Miranda warnings. Say you have the right to remain silent and then begin the questioning. IOW you have the right to remain silent, now tell me all you know. That must be confusing for some people. For foreign visitors to the US for example. Or once there were these two brothers were I live. They were very young but they thought they killed a woman. The police said they got their confessions. But when they examined the body they found she had been raped and they obviously couldn't have done it. I thought at the time they obviously confessed for that reason. It was all very confusing to them. Also if you say you want a lawyer the questioning has to end. And I read once that in Washington's time coercion was more common, even though like I said the right goes back to his time. So what explains all these things that seem to conflict with each other?
Life would be so simple, if all the criminals just walked into the police station and told the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth.
