I've been very impressed with some of the strategic moves and tactics of the Occupy Movement. From the public bullhorn to the camp outs to the live feeds, they're doin' it right! But with the events of the past week, with so many confrontations with the police over the use of public space, I think it might be time for people to focus on the local political leadership. So far they have not been targets of protests, but perhaps that time has come. As the political leaders command the police forces to use aggressive tactics to clear out encampments, there should be a strong response from the Occupy community towards those making these decisions and issuing these orders. They should be held responsible for ANY injuries that occur as a result of their orders. The local political machines should be put on notice that they will lose their jobs if they don't address the needs of the Occupiers, as well as the big picture needs that caused these protests. So far the political establishment has been reactionary or silent, other than the usual condemnations on the part of Republicans and conservative pundits. There's no way politicians can spin these events to their advantage, and these aggressive moves on the streets serve nobody's interests, and are nothing more than political posturing in an election season. There is fear in the establishment over the way this movement has grown so fast and garnered so much support. They fear the people, and so the only tool they seem to know how to use is force, which should always be the last resort. So pressure must be applied upon the political establishment to come up with new rules on protest encampments and new restrictions on the methods used to confront protesters. Police must accept new rules of engagement that are non-aggressive. Otherwise force will be met with force as seen in Oakland last night. People should confront the political establishment in person. There are usually weekly meetings in city halls where the public can attend and be heard. Has this been going on lately? Sit-ins, teach-ins, are sometimes effective in getting the message across to those in power. I know they've been doing this, but keeping it in your encampment isn't confronting the powers that be directly. Only the media and the police are there in your face. Although I guess a few politicos have managed to come down and associate themselves with the movement. But there haven't been many. As the profile and menace of the American Police State becomes more obvious, what other strategies might be useful for the Occupy movement to try?
If novel tactics are acceptable, occupy your own space, gracefully, share it with the one next to you. All civilization is based on your relationship to the person next to you.
The Oakland Occupy movement is organizing a strike to protest police treatement. Boycotts should be focused at one corp at a time on a National if not International level. That way one corp at a time can feel the heat! The others will get the message pretty quick! If a different company gets chosen for a weekly or monthly boycott (preferable), it would show some impact, esp. if the boycott is worldwide. In fact, maybe they should just keep up the boycott until the company changes its policies and addresses the boy-cotters directly. In that case you could target multiple companies at one time, and keep the boycotts going until they give in... And as our own government has shown us, boycotting something by yourself isn't going to work. You've got to pressure others to join boycott too. Just like the US pressures other countries to go along with sanctions placed on countries like Syria and Iran. So there should also be pressure on companies that do business with those companies under boycott. If they don't likewise cease biz with the boycotted company, they too get boycotted... There can also be a lot of political pressure put on elected officials to terminate government contracts with boycotted companies. If you do a full-court press against a company, they'll likely respond pretty quick because their reputation would be at stake, as well as that intangible thing called "good will" which makes up a HUGE part of their balance sheets!!!
I am all for permanent boycotts if the corporation deserves it. We buy more shit than anyone else in the world and if we just stop buying shit for a year or so it will make a huge impact on the 1%.
this what yall need to do...go out and buy red sweats and blue bandannas...this directs attention away from your faces and scary as fuck for the police because of a color grouping effect. your tents should be made of sheets and recycled free stuff on craigslist stuff...bring super soakers full of lsd for the cops...and zip ties to zip tie each other...pack up on nuts and protein if you are in for the long haul...megaphones are great...buy a bunch of military grade smoke bombs to escape raids...if being tear gassed have goggles and moisten your bandanna to throw that shit back...if you see someone being beat up charge the shit out of that group of cops...wear hats and gloves too and paint the gap of your skin color blue...super hard to identify skin color...The world is lucky I'm not a criminal...
lol keep in mind we are part of the problem...we have credit cards and consume from chains and franchises...by doing this you must be willing to deal with the consequences...free to kill and free to deal with the consequences...
LMAO! They love it! Just threaten to put LSD in the city's water supply. That'll bring out the National Guard and regular army with machine gun nests on the streets. Worked like a charm in Chicago in '68!
I like the LSD aimed at the cops, but I think we should give them MDMA, then they would hold hands and rub eachother's feet...I think that should be the next tactic. Stop buying stuff. The fastest way to change the system is by economic means. We have enough cell phones and cameras to get enough coverage on what's going on. Now stop buying them! Have to buy stuff? Support your local independent small business (the ones who are getting screwed over by the 1%).
...infiltrate County or local government positions, city council, Mayor..hell, how about about runnin' for sheriff? :cowboy: If the movement can just mobilize the even 1% of the "99%" to the ballot box... :guitarist: yeah, mutha-fuckin' Democracy y'all! 's what I'm sayin'... ZW
Entertaining an entrenched crowd is the biggest challenge. They have done huge balls and group chanting in the past. Do you think a human chain and indian dancing is feasible? At any rate, lots of activity creates a festival atmosphere and draws an even bigger crowd.
Zombiewolf is right , getting our own officials that answer to the people not the corporations into public office is a great long term strategy. In order to receive our support they must pledge not to accept any corporate funding of any kind for any purpose. Starting on a local level with school boards, city councils, and other basic civil electable positions. This would make a great base to move on to state and federal seats. The problem is its a long term strategy, we need some meaningful changes to happen pretty fast.
Sure.... Just like Obama promised to not allow lobbyists in his administration, and then proceeds to select one lobbyist after another to advise him (most from Goldman Sachs). We can't allow politicians to say one thing to get elected, then do exactly the opposite of what they promised once in office. It seems it is the OFFICE itself, and the SYSTEM itself that causes this, since it doesn't matter who it is who gets elected the system will change them. So it is the SYSTEM itself that must be changed. I see the Occupy movement as creating an alternative way of governing ourselves. This is exactly how I envision a new system coming about. You build up a new system alongside the old. Then one by one, the new system finds a better way to replace the old way of doing things. And once the new way becomes accepted, there's part of the old system that crumbles away! For instance the people CAN replace the big banks, and are already doing that by moving their money out of those banks into credit unions. They can refinance their home loans with CUs too. Now if small bizes do this too (and many are), this will eventually cause the big banks to fail, which is what MUST HAPPEN if we are ever to free ourselves of the FED and change this fucked up system!
I agree- but this has become so commonplace that regular folks have become desensitized to the point of resignation to the fact that all politicians are corrupt.. "what-ever-can-I-do-about-it?" Right you are! As do I-- as do those in office- which is why I'm a tad suspicious when established people in government proclaim any degree of solidarity with the Occupy movement. I do hope those within the movement are willing to look with healthy suspicion at the sugar coated words of the likes of Obama, Kucinich, Cicilline, Frank, Pelosi, etc... who have professed support for the occupy movement. Yes- but if the movement gets infiltrated and diverted by those who have pursued an agenda of supporting big banks and have increased their own personal fortunes in part by betting against the economy while SAYING they were working to fix it by engaging in activities that would land regular folks in prison then the vision will be lost. I do have hope that at long last the people are making themselves heard- as long as they don't allow themselves to be bamboozled by silver tongued scoundrels whose interest is anything but true reform..
The democratic system would be fine if honest folk were involved... ...and we took all the money out! That means not just cutting out all lobby and campaign finance bullshit but salary's for president, congress, senate, even supreme court fucking judges...:biker: It is and should be considered an honor and a privilege to hold and serve public office. Minimum hourly wage, 1 coffee break and 1/2 hour for lunch is all you'd get! (Make money writing your memoirs after your term if you think you're hot shit...) I had a brief term as Alderman last year in a small town outside Missoula. (I ended up moving out of the county, disqualifying me from this years elections) The majority of the quorum were Anarcho-socialists, including the Mayor, all acting under the basic premise that local people should govern themselves.. locally. Anyway, considering the economic down turn and the increasing need and desire for people to produce their own natural organic food, the council voted to radically change the local animal ordinance to not only allow chickens, but allow all livestock, provided certain criteria, most importantly that your neighbors didn't have a problem with it.( Missoula, a much larger and more urban area had voted to allow chickens years ago) We made no specifics in the ordinance restricting this or that, we left it up to the people to be respectful enough of one another to make this ordinance superfluous. So, I hope you can see what I'm getting at here... ...give the power of self-governance back to the people, hopefully they will see that things can change and feel empowered enough to get involved, let their voices be heard. One of the most frustrating things I witnessed during my time on the council was the lack of attendance, let alone participation at the council meetings. we made decisions on one important issue after another with nary a peep from local citizens. We've got to get people to realize they need to have a say in things, they need to get informed and they need to get themselves involved in what the hell is going in their town, state, and country. If we can get people (not politicians!)trusted with the goals of change set forth by the movement in local office, examples can be set that will precipitate change, say in an adjacent berg, or town, even city... (...examples like say, banning corporations from conducting any business in your town or municipality...yes, we can do that!) :2thumbsup: ZW
At first I thought that the Bank of America occupation yesterday was done by "flash mob" but that wasn't right. I thought that "flash mobs" would be useful to the Occupy protests. I realize not everyone has a cellphone, but most do. The advantage of course is that you can do actions without advance notice to the police. They'll probably get the tweet, but it takes them a long time to organize and move a lot of personnel and equipment to a location. But I bet it will soon be taken up as a tactic by the occupiers as the Police crackdown more and more...
Can the protesters make Citizen's Arrests against the Police? If the police violate the law, the citizens should be able to make citizen's arrests. So if someone is being arrested and hurt, they should be able to turn it into a citizen's arrest and demand the policeman(men) in question should also be arrested and taken down to the station for booking. This would make sense in a democracy, but this ain't a democracy anymore. Here's some laws regarding citizen's arrest. Evidently most state laws are like this: Arizona Revised Statutes 13-3884. Arrest by private person A private person may make an arrest: 1. When the person to be arrested has in his presence committed a misdemeanor amounting to a breach of the peace, or a felony. 2. When a felony has been in fact committed and he has reasonable ground to believe that the person to be arrested has committed it. Nevada Revised Statutes 171.126 Arrest by private person. A private person may arrest another: 1. For a public offense committed or attempted in his presence. 2. When the person arrested has committed a felony, although not in his presence. 3. When a felony has been in fact committed, and he has reasonable cause for believing the person arrested to have committed it. (Added to NRS by 1967, 1402) North Dakota 29-06-20. When private person may arrest. A private person may arrest another: 1. For a public offense committed or attempted in the arresting person's presence. 2. When the person arrested has committed a felony, although not in the arresting person's presence. 3. When a felony has been in fact committed, and the arresting person has reasonable grounds to believe the person arrested to have committed it. I like the "breach of the peace" statement in the Arizona law. Certainly the police have been guilty of that! If anyone were to make an arrest of a police officer, I recommend the following: have plenty of witnesses and video of the crime. Don't do it if you are outnumbered by police. They won't like it one bit. So make sure your numbers are much higher than theirs.