Is the discourse of reading the factual evolution of objectivity...?

Is the discourse of reading the factual evolution of objectivity to be essentially a perception of gestalt, OR is it after-all a living judgment in our own a priori knowledge about the Form of Idea, similarity, or struggle we remembered that we are better off now or not.

Is that living subject there and then, or here and now (in a way), adding to our lesson about survival or not?


It is natural to survive: but it may be unnatural the way we discover that in biological subjectivity.


The opinion is the manner to virtue and evolution; is it not? Knowledge is rather for virtue and courage to be.:love:

 

A thought.

God does not create human bodies, men grow them.

 

Embodied humans? the spiritual evolution WAS created by God that way.:sunny: If we believe (take up belief?) in the spirit associated with evolution.

 

huh?

 

It is my sense that our diversions are more about discovering what we have rather than moving forward. We are already growing serviceable tissues that can be plugged in.

What impression would arise if we say the absolute doesn't choose specific expression. Quantum emerge diversely but not independently.

 

Good one. I'm myself prone to scientific observers too much for Plato's measure of the knowledge of Man.