Moderator: please make this "sticky" it's an issue that seems to keep coming up lately There are ways of keeping people silent Submitted by Rice Farmer on Mon, 09/04/2006 www.911blogger.com Probably only a few people had a hand in the overall planning of 9/11, but clearly an operation of this size and complexity would require the cooperation, to one degree or another, of many people. Some of those people probably were not fully aware -- or not aware at all -- of what they were getting into; they were just following orders. Others probably knew they were involved in a false-flag attack, but did not realize that it would bring death and destruction on such a scale. So I suspect there were many levels of participation, and that, when all these people are added up, it's a considerable number. Now the problem posed is, how do you keep all those people from talking? Assuming that many people know at least part of the puzzle, if even one of them talked it would blow the lid off 9/11. Chomsky and other left gatekeepers argue that keeping all these people quiet is impossible, and therefore Bush's story must be true. Well, that is simply crap. First of all, I would imagine that most of those involved in planning and/or executing 9/11 knew it was a false-flag operation, and that if anyone talked, they would be strung up by their heels for high treason. What's more, it's not hard to imagine that most or all of these willing participants were on the take, and benefited somehow: payola, promotions, women, vacation homes, secret offshore bank accounts, and what have you. Obviously, there is little possibility that these people will talk because they'd be incriminating themselves. Life in prison or even the death penalty is a strong deterrent. What about the people who participated unknowingly? After all, it is likely that some of the people charged with certain tasks were just doing as they were told, and did not know -- until that fateful morning -- what they were assisting. Further, as the Bush regime tells one lie after another in its lame cover-up attempt, surely many people such as NORAD personnel and air traffic controllers would realize they'd been duped or used, and that the cover story couldn't be true. Wouldn't these people be likely to talk? The answer is no, and the reason is simple. We have all seen what a vicious and vindictive regime has taken control of the US. Anyone can see what might well happen to those who talk. Even those who feel a patriotic need to spill the beans must fear for their lives and those of their loved ones. Even if a person decides to talk at the risk of his or her own life, there is the knowledge that it could be the death sentence for their loved ones. Further, I'm sure there are ways to keep people quiet which we cannot even imagine. Blackmail is a well-developed weapon. Another consideration is that potential whistleblowers must surely realize that getting their message out would not be easy, and they might sacrifice their lives for nothing. After all, let's say a whistleblower spills the beans to the mainstream media. Would they run the story? Not on your life! There are probably dozens of potential whistleblowers out there who are eager to tell their stories, but are daunted by the challenge of getting their messages out. In consideration of these factors, the argument that 9/11 could not be kept secret does not stand up.
Brilliantly put exposethetruth. Threat to family members is one of the strongest "tools" used against people who dare speak up. Now, if you take the time to really look into things, people might be aware of the unexplained "thing" that was on the bottom of the plane that flew into the world tower. From many different angles, this is quite visible. What was it, why was it there, and how did it manage to get there? This is visible from many different angles. And those that work with explosives, surely must query the way in which the tower "fell".
well we should deal with what's provable, like the fact that WTC building 7 was brought down by a controlled demolition.
