While Parties are "now" contracting to serve in "positions of trust"- It might just pay to determine if our vote actually confers ownership of the Public investments from previous Generations (to parties that are only transient to these positions of trust)- and if it “really” is a Democracy when we have “no choice” on this “very” important issue? The following link is to some Draft material relating to the reasonable rights and expectations of investors in Property Included are references to various Criminal acts initiated by the same groups that are currently contracting to serve in the same "positions of trust" from which Criminal activity has occurred It was a little hard to get the page to display but hopefully the message is not lost through poor presentation The intention is to stimulate interest in freeholding certain publicly funded resources- avoiding the transfer of costs onto future generations - or having (non-elected)Corporations determine these costs http://democratic-vote.blogspot.com
if we had any real democracy the media wouldnt be shoving the false idea that their are only 2 political parties to chose from.
