"With sincerity and earnestness one can realize God through all religions. The Vaishnava will realize God, and so will the Saktas, the Vedantists, and the Brahmos. The Mussalmans and Christians will realize Him too. All will certainly realize God if they are earnest and sincere. "Some people indulge in quarrels, saying, 'One cannot attain anything unless one worships our Krishna', or, 'Nothing can be gained without the worship of Kali, our Divine Mother', or, 'One cannot be saved without accepting the Christian religion.' This is pure dogmatism. The dogmatist says, 'My religion alone is true, and the religions of others are false.' This is a bad attitude. God can be reached by different paths. "Further, some say that God has form and is not formless. Thus they start quarrelling. A Vaishnava quarrels with a Vedantist. "One can rightly speak of God only after one has seen Him. He who has seen God knows really and truly that God has form and that He is formless as well. He has many other aspects that cannot be described. "Once some blind men chanced to come near an animal that someone told them was an elephant. They were asked what the elephant was like. The blind men began to feel its body. One of them said the elephant was like a pillar; he had touched only its leg. Another said it was like a winnowing-fan; he had touched only its ear. In this way the others, having touched its tail or belly, gave their different versions of the elephant. Just so, a man who has seen only one aspect of God limits God to that alone. It is his conviction that God cannot be anything else." Sri Ramakrishna. http://www.kathamrita.org/kathamrita.htm
Thanks Bhaskar, here's more of the same. "How can you say that the only truth about God is that He has form? It is undoubtedly true that God comes down to earth in a human form, as in the case of Krishna. And it is true as well that God reveals Himself to His devotees in various forms. But it is also true that God is formless; He is the Indivisible Existence-Knowledge-Bliss Absolute. He has been described in the Vedas both as formless and as endowed with form. He is also described there both as attributeless and as endowed with attributes. "Do you know what I mean? Satchidananda is like an infinite ocean. Intense cold freezes the water into ice, which floats on the ocean in blocks of various forms. Likewise, through the cooling influence of bhakti, one sees forms of God in the ocean of the Absolute. These forms are meant for the bhaktas, the lovers of God. But when the Sun of Knowledge rises, the ice melts; it becomes the same water it was before. Water above and water below, everywhere nothing but water. Therefore a prayer in the Bhagavata says: 'O Lord, Thou hast form, and Thou art also formless. Thou walkest before us, O Lord, in the shape of a man; again, Thou hast been described in the Vedas as beyond words and thought.' "But you may say that for certain devotees God assumes eternal forms. There are places in the ocean where the ice doesn't melt at all. It assumes the form of quartz." KEDAR: "It is said in the Bhagavata that Vyasa asked God's forgiveness for his three transgressions. He said: 'O Lord, Thou art formless, but I have thought of Thee in my meditation as endowed with form; Thou art beyond speech, but I have sung Thee hymns; Thou art the All-pervading Spirit, but I have made pilgrimages to sacred places. Be gracious, O Lord, and forgive these three transgressions of mine.' " MASTER: "Yes, God has form and He is formless too. Further, He is beyond both form and formlessness. No one can limit Him." Sri Ramakrishna.
I agree in the fact all may realize yet there is only one truth though it may be known by many names in many eyes, and many religouns, christianity in particular, descend from this in many of there self righteous rightings and sometimes overinterpretted viewpoints, yet a christian is never obligated to all the views of the church and thus they may seperate themselves from that which they find false, then again path to the truth in this world, as Ive known it, is ussually anything but a paved road. Sorry if this sounds ignorant from the perspective of hinduism and due tell me for I have not studied far into it, yet I have been a seeker of the tao for a little over two years now and have found the fundamentals to be strikingly similar, yet to my suprise hinduism even seems to some degree more encompasing than taoism to include a wider spectrum to the meaning of enlightenment, neat stuff.
“The Ganga flows only in one direction within a jnani (man of knowledge). For him everything is like a dream. He always dwells in his own true Self. Within the bhakta the Ganga flows not in one direction. It has its ebb and flow. He laughs and weeps, sings and dances. Bhakta wants to enjoy himself with Him; now he swims; now he dives, now he rises; just as a lump of ice floats up and down upon the water.” “The jnani wants to know Brahman. The Bhagavan of the bhakta possessed of the six kinds of spiritual wealth is Almighty. But in fact, Brahman and Shakti are inseparable. He who is Sachchidananda is Himself Sachchidanandamayi. Take for example, the jewel and its lustre. As you talk of the lustre of a jewel, you know the jewel and when you talk of the jewel, you know its lustre. Without knowing the jewel you cannot know its lustre. Without knowing the lustre of a jewel you cannot know what the jewel is. “There is but one Sachchidananda who has different adjuncts because of (the manifestation of) His different powers. For the same reason God has many forms….. Where there is action (of creation, preservation and dissolution), there is Shakti (Power). However, when water is still, it is yet water; and when there are ripples and bubbles over its surface, it is still water. The same Sachchidananda is Himself Adya Shakti (Primeval Power) who brings about creation, preservation and dissolution. When the Captain is not working, he is still the Captain and when he is worshipping he is the same being. When the Captain goes to the ‘Lat Sahib’ (the Governor General) he is still the same only he has his particular designation (or adjunct).” Sri Ramakrishna.
