The abbreviated version: "...So in brief, a woman’s legs can, at once, both please visually or tease emotionally. And while the partial display of a woman’s breasts or buttocks functions more obviously in this seductive manner, it’s undeniable that for many, (if not most), men a pair of shapely legs alone will have the power to effect this enthralled, fascinated response...."
The point being, "...it’s undeniable that for many, (if not most), men a pair of shapely legs alone will have the power to effect this enthralled, fascinated response...." "...regardless of how this attraction is appreciated, such an allure seems to be "suggestive, possible, touch, smooth, is there more?..." "...With legs, a little can be revealed, then a little more, and so on, all the way up to “special” areas...."
Yes, it's the "bottom of the thigh" flash they use. They don't realize it, but the bottom of their thighs is because that's exactly what we see when we look down at them whilst we're f*cking them.
Most of the ones I have in the 'Ooops' file were in preparation for a manuscript I've been working on for a couple of years. On the concept of females doing minor, casual, flashing for fun only, and also how males react to such. Complete with academic studies, and hours of scanning various 'social media' sites and selecting posts by females on the topic. Very enlightening. On a simple, casual basis, it's more common than one would think. Especially since mask-wearing and the associated anonymous capability has been in use for two years now. Unfortunately for the topic of this thread, most of the oops involved only panties or not, but not stockings. Perhaps I should begin a thread of "Ooops" moments only.
#2 reminds me of my first real girlfriend in mid 20s. Thin legs, severe hairstyle, formal dressing. I spent a year and a half exploring between those legs.