that sounds like the perfect spy combination, maybe you can pick up alien communication on your mega computer to protect the earth
I participate in a program called SETI@home. It is a scientific experiment, based at UC Berkeley, that uses Internet-connected computers in the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence (SETI). Basically once you download the free software your computer analyzes radio signals recorded from various places around the globe in search of regular patterns. Currently my laptop is looking at data collected at Arecibo. It's a long shot but it is also something that interests me so what the hell. SETI@home
You know I was laughing at your statement that what modern science teaches is becoming obsolete. Not your preference of believing local legends. Time and progress seem not on Sitchins side. If anything it suited him greatly there was no one to peer review his translations and interpretations when he did. It has become apparent he took a lot of uhm well liberties
Everything is being disputed these days, when all of it is speculation, find one bone, anD this cancels out everything else. For example, Stonehenge, there were over 50 bodies buried their in a pit A fraction of these bones were from elsewhere they say, because the bones showed evidence of farming edible vegetation. No DNA involved. This could not possibly be a civilized farming community, or some people could not possibly have been farming, even though hunters and gatherers did eat vegetation. And it is completely disregarded that people from the area could have had boats, travelled elsewhere, fished, etc, They must be from elsewhere!
Modern science is far from all speculation. And a current consensus only cancels other possibilities out until proven otherwise. It's misleading and dubious to insist it goes willfully against the truth (like a pseudohistorian like Sitchin did for example). Some individuals or organisations may do so for opportunistic reasons but it's nonsense to insist this is what most scientists do to hide some fantastic truth that doesn't comply wiyh their previous research About the people who constructed Stonehenge? That's not disregarded at all.