no. You're wrong. end of discussion. heeheehee, i've seen jerks do this on other threads. really, you can still discuss it, but you'll still be wrong
Imagine and Plastic Ono Band were amazing, Ringo had nothing spectacular, and neither did George. Paul had McCartney, Red Rose Speedway, Band On The Run, Venus and Mars, McCartney II, and Tug Of War, which I find all to be super brilliant... especially the first 3. :H
What? You didn't even mention RAM. () Anyway, George had great post-Beatles albums. How are you forgetting All Things Must Pass?
! I didn't forget about it... but I don't find it to be all that great and I don't think it ever reached number 1 in either the U.S. or the U.K.. I have not heard that... I was thinking of Wonderwall Music and some other one that I own, which is just so... sucky.
Wonderwall was put out during the 60's...Ringo had some awesome albums..."Ringo" for one was the closest thing to a Beatles reunion and the not so well known"good night vienna" i think is one of the best albums ever....George also had "Living in the material word" and "dark horse" and the spectacular, and its a shame he died, "brainwashed" caus ethis was a great kick start to his career... i think paul had the wort albums...John were very good, cause he really didn't care what people thought...neither did george
Well, Sir Paul could've used a wardrobe malfunction (and a face lift), his half time show was totally toothless and blah. Perfect for this day and age in Republican America, especially at sporting events, where the music hasn't changed in 30 years... and 'Thank you, Super Bowl!' ? What was that about? Did he even know what the super bowl is...? pretty funny
