Hillary Clinton

And don't forget he has praised: Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, Vladimir Putin, and Kim Jong Un. The real worse people in the world.
He thinks the Chinese government's massacre of students in Tienanmen Square showed strength and when informed he was quoting Mussolini he said what difference does it make?

​

​

​

I'm sure you may want to take all that into consideration when you vote.

 

Yes, I forgot them because there aren't any!

Here's just one example: Clinton committed perjury.
And this is assuming he may have lied, which he didn't.

Same goes for Hillary.

If you wish to discuss it start a thread and we'll go over every instance you care to raise point by point.

 

Then why weren't they prosecuted?

 

Yes it was a maxim used by Mussolini and many others including Alexander The Great in various forms.
It is attributed in "Duce (1922-42)" in TIME magazine (2 August 1943) ~ Benito Mussolini

The point is that when he was told it was a quote of Mussolini's, he didn't care. He should have explained that he was using it in another context, which would be fine, but he was comfortable quoting a dictator.

 

So what you are saying is that in your and some others view they did something wrong...but in the eyes of the law, they didn't.

You would convict on insufficient evidence that is not not admissible in court, I wouldn't.
Right and wrong are never as cut and dried as you would like us to believe. I don't know all the facts in the case, the numerous investigations do. I have faith in the, what was it five investigations? You have no faith in them and even though you aren't privy to all the facts, you fill comfortable judging these people. I don't.

So that's that, you're free to think whatever you want.

 

So you aren't contending that anything done by ACORN was bad...just wrong? What's the difference?

And your point is that even though you don't know all the facts and the 5 investigations do, you can safely conclude that the only reason possible for those statements was to give advice on how to commit criminal activity, one might reasonable conclude that your reasonable conclusion isn't reasonable.

The L.A. office would not assist them in illegal activities.
​The Philadelphia office filed a police report.
​The San Diego office reported them to the police.
The California AG tells us the San Bernardino office caught on to the interviewers and played along with them.
New York City investigators tell us that the edited tape appears to show ACORN giving advice on how to hide money from prostitution, the unedited tape does not.

That's your opinion, my point is that factually 5 investigations found no criminal activity, any other conclusion of "wrongness" is only opinion.

You associate wrong with your opinion and values, even though you don't have all the facts.

Exactly, it;s not an issue.

Okay, I'll revise that statement as I was using the term "wrong doing" in the criminal sense and you wish to include value judgments.

Breitbart aired a video that insinuated that ACORN committed illegal acts, they did not.
He admitted he didn't know what was on the tapes yet he aired them as part of a personal vendetta against ACORN.

So what it comes down to is that you believe Breitbart is a Legitimate news source even though five investigations found otherwise in the ACORN case, and you stand by their posting of the Clinton Cash video...am I right?

 

We're talking about Trump's infatuation with dictators, not the conditions in Iraq or Libya.

I'm not going to go through each of his quotes on these guys, you can look them up, but I'll just post one to give you an idea what I'm talking about.

This is typical Trump talk. He tells us Kim Jung Un is "the boss", and incredible for killing off his top generals, and then turns around and tells us we better not play games with him.

He did the same with Tienanmen Square, etc. The point is not that he doesn't realize these things are wrong, the point is he admires the strength these dictators and governments use to quell those who are against them. He admires absolute power, and that is contrary to our form of government. Yes he tells us Kim is a maniac, but he also clearly admires how he handles his country.

Taken as a single quote, there's nothing wrong with what he said here, and not much wrong with his other quotes...but taken as a whole and coupled with his desire to illegally torture people, to force our military to murder innocent people, his desire to ban all Muslims from temporarily entering the States, he's branding himself as the "law and order" candidate, his insistence that only he can right all wrongs and only he has all the answers, his acceptance of chants of "lock her up" at his rallies, his offer to pay the legal expenses of anyone "knocking the hell" out of protesters at his rallies......and then his denial that he ever said or condoned these things, or his reversals when called to task...these quotes about dictators take on a new light.

They show someone who admires concentrated power in a single person or governmental agency.