jill stien. i mean, ok hillary. or a frog. anything to not be seen in the same room with chump. even a vogon or the bugbladder beast of trol. i mean there's slime and there's slime.
Trump, and would probably slip him a little tongue too. Then I'd whisper in his ear, "Make America great again ya big sillyhead."
I refuse to buy into your false choice! Jill Stein is an attractive woman and has much better fashion sense than Hillary. Gary Johnson has the crazy eye thing going on but other than that he's mildly attractive and probably good in bed. And he's rich too.
it's a strategic thing really. the experience would be pretty awful in either case. but i imagine hillary would put on a big fake smile and announce to the crowd "now this guy knows how to kiss!" whereas trump would probably go the other way and shout something like "whoa whoa whoa, this fucking queer wants to kiss me! he just mouth raped me, and it was the worst kiss ever! i've kissed alligator vagina that tasted better than his lips! somebody should build a wall around his mouth!" so, i figure kissing hillary would be better for my overall reputation, if i have to bite the bullet with one of them.
Kissing Trump might straighten you out after getting gay from kissing Hillary though. Then you'd have done a full cycle.
i think the question should be which would you rather eat, lukewarm oatmeal, or a flaming turd. the chump is entertaining but dam, there's no way in hell i'd want that for breakfast.
i know. i don't feel threatened by hillary. she may or may not be crooked as a dog's hind leg, she loves business and the bankers, so show me a politician who doesn't. i mean one the media doesn't try to hide the existence of. but trump, its more then what comes out of his mouth. he has a long, well documented, publicly accessable record, of involvement with the actual mafia, not to mention his business practices. dolars to doughnuts he has connections with the russian mafia too. there's no way to be honest about what we're seeing and not sounding melodramatic about it. will trumps more rapid death of democracy be a mercifully less painful one? i really seriously doubt it. of course there's no guarantee everything will die with either of them, just awfully hard to pretend to believe it isn't likely. the only reason we even have trump or hillary is corporate media. if they gave as much attention to johnson and stien, or even just never mentioned trump again until after the election. forget spoilers. how can you spoil what's already putrified. wasserman sholtz is why we don't have burnie, media is why we have trump at all. i want to hug jill and gary. i don't know how many warts they would have if they had as much public scrutiny. i'm sure everyone has some. but that's just it, we know why they don't want joe sixpack to know anything but trump and hillary exist. ignoring trump might not make him go away, but keeping the spotlight on him is what keeps him looming larger like that plant in the little shop of horrors.
if everything hillary were accused of, were absolutely true, as unlikely on the face of, as likewise if none of it were, it would still be trivial compared to what 'the right' and espcially trump, openly brag about. so being against hillary on that basis makes no sense at all. she was just never my first choice. but she certainly isn't my last or least. she's not my furst because the business of business is the monkey business that got us screwed up, starting with raygun, in the furst place. comparing trump to hillary is like comparing, i'm sorry but trump IS a self proclaimed biggot, hitler, to the nice little old lady who runs the coffee shop down the street. i mean ok, so she's a business person and business, like politics, isn't always nice. being nice isn't always an asset in either. a reputation for being nice is. but actually doing so doesn't appear to be. but dam there's a big difference between that, and just blatently coming out and telling everyone to hate everyone who isn't like some imaginary normal that doesn't exist anyway.