People Do Not Have A Hand In Global Warming!

Fantasy? Oh? You think the atmospheric collapse was a fantasy? You think those strange noises heard all over the world was a fantasy? You aren't worth talking to anymore. It's a shame, I've read a lot of your old posts (we haven't played together before today) and I always sorta liked you. Now I think you stink. You just lost a fan, poop face.

 

Don't let them troll you. You're right. Matter IS energy vibrating. EMI can alter DNA. Infrasonic energy can cause earthquakes. We have no idea of the extent that our technology, namely AC electricity has on our surroundings. Even PV solar, which is DC and doesn't cause near as much EMI uses charge controllers that pulse, causing high frequency EMI which reaches out way further than DC EMI. It's exactly how radio, radar, and wifi work.

Anyone that's ever designed and built an electric motor control system is very aware of these principles and must design around them. Trying to design a high power gate drive array that runs at ultra high frequencies without suffering from interference is the most difficult part of the design. I can tell if there's a cell phone charger plugged in or a pwm solar charge controller running from 50 feet away because I feel it in my whole body. Same thing when I turn my wifi on and off or there's a cell call coming in. Do you ever pick your cell phone up a split second before it rings? EMI is what triggers you to do that and it's constantly rearranging every atom it flows through. It's actually amazing we're still alive at all!

To OP,
Please educate yourself before continuing to spread ignorance and propaganda on the internet. Educate doesn't mean reading headlines either. It means reading about theories on both sides of the fence and researching the references. Until you have a sound basic level of understanding of all of the fields of science, you are merely a bandwidth wasting puppet, supporting causes you don't comprehend.

 

One of my other points of reference, that I didn't mention in this thread, but you sort of did, is how data transmissions are atmospheric. Data transmissions (electromagnetic signal, such as an electrical voltage, radiowave, microwave or infrared signal) really are not natural and I just don't think it's so wise to presume it's all so completely "safe". I don't like all the fixation on chemical when I think electricity BEGS to be considered.

I have no problem acknowledging that I'm not scientifically trained and I haven't graduated from college but I'm not senseless. I know things on a different level and I don't speak academia, so it's really difficult to convey my perceptions to an audience that may not be receptive to what I put forth.

I think what's so normal and what we're so accustomed to .. humanity becomes BLIND to it .. for presuming it's so safe on account of normalcy. I realize I stick my neck WAY out there .. I've drawn ridicule and shunning for my voice in the matter. I quite don't care.

 

I have gone to college. I took advanced physics classes, learned what I needed to know, literally told the Dean to fuck off and broke his door upon leaving the office because the school was managed so poorly with so little respect for its students.

I learned in school that a lot of the best ideas come from those that aren't indoctrinated by education because their minds weren't programmed with limits. People that think Newtonian physics is peak of knowledge are about 40 years behind the rest of the world. The really good ideas often hatched by "uneducated" thinkers and refined through collaborative discussion by people from all different backgrounds.

Two phrases that I'd like to stop hearing and even occasionally using myself are, "You are wrong.", and, "That will never work." I'm trying to train myself to replace those with, "I disagree.", and, "It doesn't seem likely based upon my experience that what you are proposing will work."

 

Maybe the lack of communication derives from your impressionistic descriptions of processes.

 

not sure what effect EMI has on the atmosphere but so many devices use such a narrow band of frequencies that that band will be overcrowded pretty soon. EMI definitely causes strange effects, and for some reason a lot of things wants to use the 2.4GHz frequencies especially. Of course there are different channels within that bandwidth multiplexed in several different ways but there are only so many available and part of what actually makes this work (and i have studied it a bit, and its really amazing to me that this can actually work at all) is limiting the transmission power of each device so that its signal is only effective for a short distance, and so the same channels can be reused over and over as long as devices using the same channels aren't too close to each other. that's what it means when a device says FCC passed, that it meets FCC regulations on RF emissions. this is really important since people keep having more and more wireless things. in really dense metropolitan areas there can be hundreds (or thousands) of devices per city block and ive noticed some strange behavior, mostly random intermittent failure to function. i wonder if manufacturers always adhere to the standards, or if sometimes they bend the rules a bit to get what seems to be better performance than a competitor?

money is the thing that will destroy us quicker than anything because it creates the requirement for such competition for limited resource, the primitive "survival of the fittest" mentality .. not enough to go around .. there is no real scarcity in this world in the 21st century, only a scarcity of money. money creates incentive to commit crime, when life has dealt you a shit hand, one has to eat and will do what has to be done to survive. the US dollar is worth nothing, it is a piece of paper which itself represents nothing.

people may say that products cost money because it takes money to create them, that is bullshit. the GNU project and countless other open source software project prove that a quality product can be developed completely free, free to use without restriction, and anyone can contribute. and the people that work on these projects, surely they don't do it for the money, they do it cuz its they're passion and what they were born to do. most of the internet runs open source software.

 

We definitely get more from others, and ourselves, when being hospitable and fair. If hostility and cruelty are the norm, we will be blind to its damaging impact and of course .. blind to cost of what is lost.

Climate change / global warming is a huge interest of mine. I won't ever stop contributing what I believe.

 

I guess it's that time

 

If money represents nothing, I'll gladly accept your throw-aways. :crowngrin: :daisy: :clown:

 

Ok, what technology are you talking about? Weather manipulation!!! really? Isn't the gov't made up of humans...why are they blaming humans for an agenda (sorry, what was the agenda again...missed that)? Why is man-made global warming bullshit? Because......?

Wait a second, if you believe man-made global warning is bullshit, then how is the man-made government using technology to manipulate the weather??? Could that man-made whether manipulating technology produce global warming? If it does, then wouldn't global warming be real??????????

I wish non-believers would present facts, not rhetoric or personal belief!

 

It'd be nice if the alarmists took their carbon cutting rituals to the next level and just stopped breathing.

 

Oh please. This shit should get moved to the conspiracy theory section

 

.

 

What are your scientific credentials? What are your information sources?

 

Weather modification, cloud seeding, is a known technology that has existed for decades.

http://youtu.be/pllRW9wETzw

(can't get the video to embed, oh well)

 

I suggest people look into what Walter Russel had to say about all this and read his book Atomic Sucide. It's not the least surprising that many profiting off the carbon taxation scheme are also connected to nuclear power. If anyone really believes that carbon dioxide in excess is causing us probl;ems? Do everyone a favor and hold your breath, that way you don't exhale more of it into the atmosphere.

 

Who exactly was measuring atmospheric gasses during the industrial revolutioon, or even billions of years ago? Nobody that I know of, so that seems like a highly flawed assumption to make.

 

*sigh*
Uhhmmmm, ice core sampling, ever hear of it?

google "ice core co2" and educate yourself. :book:

 

Actually it is a mix of gasses, Co2 being only one of the main ones and one of the easiest to test for going back historically, but methane is far more detrimental and we have most certainly increased the levels of methane in the atmosphere ever since we first domesticated cattle.

If you don't understand that, google it as well and further your education.