Interesting info about chemtrails

Planes have been flying around and leaving contrails since the invention of the combustion engine jet. Nothing on earth has changed since.

 

You don't get it. Keep trying. Nothing's changed except for accelerated climate change and the fact that people are getting sick from heavy metals and poisons falling from the sky. Contrails and chem trails are two different things, kinda. Go to Joe Cooper Ford in Midwest City, OK sometime and run your finger over a car. It will turn black from the jet fuel exhaust. The residue has mercury, lead, and all sorts of terrible shit in it, and those are the chemicals that are in contrails. Chemtrails come from jet mounted spyayer systems. The trails don't even come out of the plane's engines and they hang in the sky and dissipate really slowly. This is geoengineering or chemtrails and has been proven and flat out admitted to.

If you don't beleive it, despite the overwhelming amount of evidence and flat out admissions, you've got your head in the sand, and I'm not just talking about the sand that's falling from the sky.

 

The migraine of the contrail / chemtrail debate has a new contender: Oxford University.

Either chemtrail conspiracy theorists take full credit for having *created* the content Oxford displays on their public webpage - or - chemtrail conspiracy theorists are not conspiracy theorists.

Game over.

 

the conspiracy here, is ever so blatantly, to create a conspiracy, so rediculous, for no other reason, then to cast doubts on the reality, that real conspiracies do happen.

 

I live in the city of Pittsburgh where there is over 100years worth of Steel works and Railroad pollution .. think I give a FLYING fucking about some chemtrails??

maybe run this past the countries that are not part of the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kyoto_Protocol

 

Basically, everyone must face that the planes are just normal.

Even if planes are administering adulterants that cause respitory illness or whatever, to confront an issue that you have no control of is useless and feeble. You will join the ranks of a foil hatter and be ridiculed to no end.

Repeat. "It's ice crystals, you mean a jet contrail" few hundred times. Ice crystals.

Teflon frying pan coating, that is something smart people care about.

 

Not talking about planes in this thread.

I consider Oxford University to be an "authoritative" source. What I read on their webpage is not new to me ... I heard it first from the "chemtrail" community. Either those so-called conspiracy theorists actually came up with idea themselves or they're not conspiracy theorists. It's possible that they simply knew that which already is.

Of course, the Oxford Geoengineering Programme outlines "proposed geoengineering techniques" but the fact of the matter is right before our eyes: http://www.geoengineering.ox.ac.uk/what-is-geoengineering/what-is-geoengineering/

The bottom line is: people CAN discuss "chemtrails" as it relates to geoengineering, without the unwarranted ridicule.

 

Interesting!

Can someone tell me just WHERE these "chemicals" are coming from?

Where in the plane, either civilian or military, are the chemicals stored? There is NIL spare room in wings or fusilage!

How is the flow regulated and plumbed to the outside?

Who installs these tanks in the wings or fusilage? (Before or after manufacture of the aircraft!)

Who refills them?

Who supplies the chemicals?

Answers please

 

WOT?

No answers?

How about some comments on "Controlled demolitions"? I REALLY like that one. And how about "no plane at the Pentagon"? When visiting the Pentagon I was talking to a US Army Officer that actually saw the plane approaching over the hotel, and the actual impact.

 

well of course someone could say he would say that. but people are barking up the wrong conspiracy on that one, the conspiracy was in who was behind it, not how it was carried out.

i seriously like you're questions on the "chem"trails though. truly we live in a new age of ignorance and superstition about really basic and simple science.

there is crap in the air, but most of it comes out of the exhaust pipes of cars and the cooling towers of coal fired power plants.

it isn't some secret cabal poisoning us. its our own emotional attachment to familiar but wrong headed ways of doing things.

economic interest have usurped political process in so called free countries, but there's nothing woo woo about that either, even if they do try to keep people from being aware of and thinking about that one. (they, meaning "conservative" think tanks, the national chamber of commerce (u.s.), and the american legislative exchange council)

 

themnax,

What comes out of the cooling towers is EXACTLY the same stuff as condensation trails, WATER VAPOUR!

Agree about car exhausts, we should go back to horse drawn freight! Their waste products are almost as bad.

 

i was speaking metaphorically to say cooling towers, what i meant was the use of combustion to keep power production centralized. (and that releases a hell of a lot more and else then water vapor. not that anyone puts it there, but there ARE the natural products of any use of combustion) and i think most people with more then fifth grade education are perfectly well aware that a transportation policy not dominated by the automobile, does NOT mean having to revert to foot traffic and beasts of burden. not that there aren't a lot of people it wouldn't hurt to have to use their own legs a bit more at that.

"chem" trails are bullshit, obviously, but so are lame excuses for backward headed transportation and energy policy.

the only thing we "need" coal and uranium for, is to keep power generation monopolistically centralized, and the only thing we "need" hydrocarbon fuels for, is to keep people indentured to their cars.
there is absolutely no reason, other then greed and familiarity, that transportation cannot be publcally owned, engineered to both respect environment and maximize useful service, and be powered by clean sources of energy.

bullshit excuses for not doing so, are simply self serving and absolutely dishonest.

its all very nice for people and politicians to say they "care about the environment", but as long as transportation policy, remains dominated by the automobile, we're whistling in the dark and kissing our species' ass goodby.

 

everything we are doing, that is screwing up the planet, and the lives of each other,

we don't need to be doing.

not just don't need to be doing (in many cases need to be not doing) for survival,

but don't need to be doing to enjoy living,

nor to have ease and comfort in doing so.

 

Oh please dont tel me someone actually linked to beforeitsnews for a ref.