http://www.zombietime.com/zomblog/?p=1782 I dont think the person who wrote this supports nudism. Perhaps nudism may NEVER be fully supported, how sad.
That article dates from 2011, and since then the "nude freedom activists" in San Francisco have thrown away their own freedom and everyone else's. Too many of them were actually exhibitionists with a sexual motivation (Toivo please note) and the result was, a law against public nudity where it had always been legal before. Genuine naturists could maybe have done something, but they were pretty unwilling to speak up and say that they didn't want to lose their rights because other people were irresponsible--it was just too murky to decide who was an ally and who was an enemy. So no more legal nudity in San Francisco. As the slogan says, "Lewd it and lose it". Now it's lost.
I don't think anything is ever fully supported. Even things that you would assume are widely loved--like cake.
It seems to me that textiles come up with all sorts of reasons NOT to be nude, this society is in favour of the textiles obviously.
