P.e.T.A. Kills Animals, Routinely

People just aren't aware of all that goes on with P.e.T.A.

 

Now, we do know:2thumbsup:

That's a pretty damning report, and would, I believe, cause any other organization to lose their registration status -- but PeTA is not any other organization, they're a very wealthy aggressive organization.

As for people taking animals to that facility, well yes, they do know, because they're PeTA employees, sent out to collect animals.

 

All "PETA Kills Animals" roads lead back to a disinformation campaign engineered by a meat industry front group. The Center for Consumer Freedom fights all social change organizations that threaten corporate interests. In fact, the Center for Consumer Freedom was originally funded by money from the tobacco lobby, and the CCF's founders are the same people who fought tobacco regulation.

Anyway, I run the www.whypetaeuthanizes.com website. I hope you'll take a look before deciding to side with the meat industry against animals. Peace.

 

No, all of the "PeTA kills animals" roads lead to PeTa.

Maybe you can tell us why the e is lower case?

 

Let's say that you aren't making this all up and the 'PETA kills animals' campaign was started by the meat industry. Does that mean that they're wrong? Just because some corporate entity said it to protect their business, doesn't mean that they're automatically lying.

Honestly, I'd trust a bunch of corporate PR scumbags over a lunatic fringe organization that compares KFC to the Third Reich any day.

 

If it's true, I don't care who started the campaign.

I can't believe that PeTA is still even around, buying fucking super bowl ads should have taken ALL their credit. They spent enough money to save a large amount of habitat, or to build MULTIPLE shelters, or to keep many many animals happy for the rest of their NATURAL lives, and instead they paid for an ad about vegetarian sex being better, or kinkier, or..... something-er. Not an ad that would convince ANYONE of ANYTHING, just a "look what we can do" ad.

It's fucking infuriating.

 

Don't drop in here with this crap. No one here is against animals. No one here is siding with big beef, or big anything for that matter, and your attempt at making us feel guilty is wasted.

Fuck PETA.

 

But you can't hate bad people, because other bad people also hate those bad people :willy_nilly:

 

Stooopid PETA.

 

I actually skimmed through Iknowthings's last sentence because I got the gist of what he was saying before I got to it and I just now read the end of it.

He said that if you hate PETA, or if you eat meat, you're against animals. :banghead:

I do both of those things (though I haven't eaten meat in about five days or so) and I love animals. I volunteered at a local animal hospital over the summer last year and I might end up doing it again this summer if I have the time. I took in a stray kitten two years ago and he's curled up at my feet right now purring. The fact that this guy would say that I'm somehow anti-animal despite all of this is infuriating.

 

hey Iknowthings, I know some things too, like there is no way ever no matter what type of hysteria you want to instigate, regardless of all PeTA's campaigns, yada, yada, that you are going to convince the majority to give up meat.
Ain't gonna happen, no way, no how.

So I'm gonna go throw a steak on the fire, maybe some chicken as well, and ostrich meat is certainly tasty. Yum, Yum!

But first I better chain up my dogs, and lock the cats in the garage because they love meat too. :love:

 

Thanks, and good points. In the end I guess I'd rather stand with "People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals" rather than the dead flesh industry.

 

.......you'd rather side with bad guys because of their name, and what their supporters claim about everybody who doesn't like them? The world's not black and white, you can obviously dislike peta without SIDING with the meat industry.

For that matter, (though this is top secret, the fascists at PeTA don't want you to know it) you can totally eat meat in an ethical way, you're not limited to un-ethical producers. Even if you hate peta AND eat meat, you can be moral about it.

I mean, if you're not a stalinist, maybe it's because you side with their arch-enemies, the NAZIs! Isn't it better to be friends with josef than adolf?

No wait, that's a totally shitty logical fallacy of an argument, like the sort of "with us or against us" rhetoric that bush brought to the front of american politics.

 

:2thumbsup: Thankyou for pointing out that thinking outside of the box is a healthier choice. Between the choice of two evils I'll be a rogue and bring in my own perspective. I can eat an animal without killing it for no purpose at all like peta. Anyone who says that what they are doing is ok because the big meaty industry is so much worse has some wires loose for not even acknowledging that there is still a wrong being committed that you can't hide behind other wrongs. peta= Poeple Ending Tiny Animals.

 

...

 

omg! that pic is so hilarious. it works

 

We do, what?
'registration status' - what do you mean? At some point they were an 'animal shelter' and by 2010 they were not an 'animal shelter'?

 

What I mean is what the registrar guy noted: that they are registered as an animal shelter to buy drugs and have the right to kill animals, but when he went to inspect this animal shelter to keep them registered as such, the employees didn't even know they had one and would be subject to inspection as such.

So, sort of what you said, yes.

 

Where did you get those details from?

http://www.whypetaeuthanizes.com/popular-misconceptions.html

 

even someone arguing for PeTA should have no problem ripping that page apart. It is supremely dishonest in it's tactics, and should only convince someone who really wants to be convinced.

Seriously, read it, and see if you can actually see any of PeTA's feet.... because they're dancing pretty fuckin' fast.