No need to feel lonely - the entire universe is inside you

:sunny:

 

If there is anything extremely lonely it's when the whole universe is actually inside me.

 

But if everything is inside you, then you are already connected to everything.

You just need to realise and believe in your connection :sunny:

 

If everything is in me and I am everything it means that there is nothing but me.

 

I am he as you are he as you are me as we are all together.

Or another one I like,

I am another yourself.
I believe that is a Hopi proverb.

 

There is everything else, but everything else is a part of you, an extension of you.

You have more influence on your reality than you believe :sunny:

 

One I like is the paradoxal 'we are one'.

 

That depends on how you look at things, I believe most things are predestinated, innate and knowable. Kinda. Sort of.

 

Existence is a paradox... paradoxes only arise from determinism and the duality of our existence.

Existence creates duality, duality creates paradoxes, paradoxes create existence.

It's a loop in this version of existence... folding in on itself.

Knowing the outcome has the potential or likelihood to alter it, that is the nature of our reality.

You can never truly know the future - only one of the possibilities.

There may be pointers that guide you to find the right thing that's most appropriate to your enjoyment/existence.

 

You've never read Oedipus then.

 

I haven't read it, no - I'm just aware of the overview of the story.

I think it's possible that we each may have a path that we're perhaps supposed to take... but influence or non-action is still possible.

The observer effect has been experimentally proved to show that we can alter the outcome of a "destined" pattern.

 

How has it been proven?

 

I prefer this one.

 

I suppose one could argue that it was destined to change upon each observation.

 

Things that look like universe things just coincidentally reside within my body... I'm not lonely.

 

It's always lonely at the top jk

Hey, I've seen the upper comparison of pics before (the one between the braincell and the universe) but I already wondered then what kind of pic of the universe we are looking at (artificial impression or not? if so, to what extend) and how sure we can be that it looks like that. I've seen an animation of space in the bigger context in a documentary where it looks like this and the galaxies and all would be located in the red stuff but I guess I'm just a bit critical wat it's actually based on :daisy:

 

It's based on observation... we've seen the structure of galaxies and galaxy super clusters by distinguishing density and distance.

That specific picture may be a render, but it's based on observation