I watched the first series but lost interest after that. Seriously, if all you you do is take one sided generic swipes and not engage in what I am saying - please keep it to yourself. You're boring the fish over here, chap.
I understand your point. This isn't proving your point, though. It's just reiterating your opinion with out any evidence of it being true. Like I said: What are the names of these teenage girls? (We clearly are getting nowhere with the HR347)
If I knew their names, it wouldn't be called a 'secret' kill list. But I was just reading today how Obama's old press secretary, before Jay Carny was warned that he could NOT mention drones to the press. Then Obama acknowledged them but said "It's easier and cheaper than other types of Military Action." But he has used them to Drone Strike citizens with no trial, civilians in middle eastern countries, and thusly he's creating instability in the Middle East, tension toward America and, possibly creating terrorist in places like Libya and that surrounding area. Even the UN said Drone Strikes violate Human Rights, and Obama kept right on doing it! And that's exactly what I'm saying about the Obama Administration; there is no transparency. I know you're not American, but Obama is a new day "Tricky Dick" (Richard Nixon.)
You don't know there names but you know they are teenage girls? So how do you know they are teenage girls? What is your source for this information? There must be some kind of evidence drones are going after teenage girls. Is this a direct quote or your own personal inference? I could not find that quote. I agree. It's interesting that you mock 'liberals' but take their side when it suites you. I wouldn't go as far as saying: 'UN said Drone Strike violates Human Rights' - but it's close enough. Ofcourse, you despise the UN, right? The engine for the OWG I do appreciate your passion but it just seems so scatter-brained and not always based on reality.
I'm well aware of that, and I was just questioning what appears to be a radically misconceived purpose of the U.S. Constitution.
I guess it must be something to do with gun regulation as to why Americans dont like him. I understand that Americans believe owning a gun gives them a bigger penis...
Guns are to protect ourselves from tyrannical governments. "The beauty of the Second Amendment, is that we will not need it, until they try to take it." ~Thomas Jefferson~ And in fact it makes sense, because I looked up gun murder statistics in the UK and Cop-On-Citizen murders account for 40% of all firearm related murders!
Tough to say given how polling is done in this country. If I had to lay money though I would say it is a minority opinion. Doesn't really change anything though.
No need to apologise. Well, I have a feeling he will say it is a majority opinion. You say it is a minority opinion (if money was on it). I think somewhere in gun owners reasoning it is majority opinion. Perhaps not the overwhelming reason.