Was America behind 9/11

Discussion in 'Conspiracy' started by AliceDee17, Aug 21, 2011.

  1. ForgetThisEmail

    ForgetThisEmail Member

    Messages:
    369
    Likes Received:
    2
    It comes down to the evil and the good and which side we are really on.

    Here is my site about my 3 days at WTC helping to remove bodies etc etc from the site after the planes crashed.

    http://web.archive.org/web/20080118134747/hometown.aol.com/danielegrl/myhomepage/news-crisis.html


    The following is a Quote from that site i wrote after i left 9/11 / WTC


    """Finally, the enemy is all around us. It isn't a country. It isn't an ethnicity. It isn't a religion. It is simply ,,, good ,,, verses ,,, evil.

    " I ...have ...done ....All ...that ...I ....could. Seen ..... the .... Evil .... And .... The .... Good ... and ... I .... am .... crying.
    " Doctor,, in ,,, my ,,, eyesssssss etc etc etc... """"
     
  2. Zzap

    Zzap Member

    Messages:
    657
    Likes Received:
    21




    you have to keep in mind that people are delusional!



    but trust me! scouts honor! america had nothing to do with 911! honest! LOL
     
  3. KenzieLPark

    KenzieLPark Guest

    Messages:
    9
    Likes Received:
    0
    I believe the papers warning of those attacks sat on the desk in the oval office since the Clinton years, that part is common knowledge.

    The Bush "Regime" were and still are business giants, a regime that is still technically in office due to his flunkies in congress.
    During those years Bush gave Rumsfeld a defense budget that would be able to conquer the world.
    Halliburton got paid to rebuild those countries we destroyed, however they never did rebuild. They would get paid, set up a fence around the property, buy the raw materials, and then leave the site with the materials still sitting there to this day.

    I believe 9/11 was, as horrible as it was to the public to watch, a business venture for our politicians.
     
  4. Still Kicking

    Still Kicking Members

    Messages:
    452
    Likes Received:
    42
    I believe that any government is capable of any act it decides it needs to take, regardless of it's mandate. Given that all governments are nothing more than tools for big money interests, anything is possible.
    The oil interests needed a way to get into the oil fields in Iraq, the simplest way to do that is to stir up public opinion by making everyone think we were attacked by terrorists who were the tools of the regimes over there that would not deal with them. The people here, mostly ignorant and apathetic, seldom question anything beyond when Walmart will have the next shipment of Cheetos in, since they were out of them that last time they went shopping, and the big game is on this Sunday.
     
  5. RetiredHippie

    RetiredHippie Hick

    Messages:
    2,925
    Likes Received:
    613
  6. odonII

    odonII O

    Messages:
    9,803
    Likes Received:
    26
    Can you (or anybody) clear up this issue once and for all: who actually has control over Iraq's oilfields? How much more oil has flowed into the US (or anywhere else) since 2003? Has oil dependence increased or decreased in the US?
     
  7. storch

    storch banned

    Messages:
    5,293
    Likes Received:
    719
    Sure. I believe that the same people who brought you 9/11 and the Iraq war actually controls Iraq's oil fields.
     
  8. ForgetThisEmail

    ForgetThisEmail Member

    Messages:
    369
    Likes Received:
    2
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_nzpBJdUvgk&feature=g-all-c"]Solving 9/11: Project Hammer, Financial Crimes, & Bankster Bailouts! - YouTube
     
  9. odonII

    odonII O

    Messages:
    9,803
    Likes Received:
    26
    ...and who would they be then? ...be specific and add evidence, if possible. Thanks.
     
  10. Still Kicking

    Still Kicking Members

    Messages:
    452
    Likes Received:
    42
    You can start with these:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j7t_u641NyM
    http://www.channel4.com/news/articles/world/who+controls+iraqs+oil/1838667.html
    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/tag/iraq-oil
    http://www.aljazeera.com/focus/2009/06/20096288505111580.html

    How much oil flows is not the issue. It is the control of it which controls the prices.
    Obviously, there are no official documents available that confirm the reason why we invaded Iraq, other than the so called weapons of mass destruction which was a bull shit reason in anyone's book.
    Also obviously, it takes some leaps of logic to connect the dots, since no government is going to admit oil was the reason for the invasion. All we have is gleaning what is being said at government levels and putting things together. And, also obviously, it is big money interests that run the world. That should be obvious given the level of lobbying done by those interests. If lobbying is nothing more than buying what they want, then what is it? It is nothing more than legal bribery.
    So, no one is going to be able to provide direct proof. No one can when it comes to government that have little or no "transparency" ( I love these little sayings people come up with, it all sounds so James Bondish) to the people they supposedly represent. Freedom of information act requests are so redacted that they make no sense at all. Conspiracy theories will continue until governments are not allowed to have secrets any longer, which in my opinion they do not need to have, all their actions should be open, including those with foreign governments.
    The links provided are just a few readily available on the Net on this subject, so it takes some time to glean the answers. The answers being, of course, who is working now to control the oil, that should tell us who was behind the invasion. Really, it does not take a lot of imagination to see that no one was really going to get upset over a petty dictator getting his ass kicked, so it was a logical place to invade to obtain control over that resource, especially given the ridiculous reasons provided by the government for it. Weapons of mass destruction, HAH!
     
  11. odonII

    odonII O

    Messages:
    9,803
    Likes Received:
    26
    Thanks. There was some great info' in those links.

    Understanding the Kurdistan Production Sharing Contracts

    KRG: Kurdistan Regional Government http://www.krg.org/?l=12


    2008:


    Half of the oilfields are in the Shia south and most of the rest are in the north around Kirkuk.

    The recently-opened oilfield is in the area controlled by the Kurdish regional government near Irbil. Iraq's cheap-to-extract and easy-to-refine crude could make the nation rival Saudi Arabia as the world's top oil earner.

    2009:


    On June 30 major companies - including Exxon, Shell, BP and Total - will gather at Iraq's oil ministry in Baghdad for a two-day meeting to take part in the first bidding round for oil service contracts.

    "Based on the constitution, there is a clause that says oil and gas is the property of the Iraqi people and the central government is responsible for the budget. So the Iraqi budget is based on oil and gas revenues. How can the central government plan without having control of oil and gas resources?"

    Nevertheless, the KRG has pushed ahead and signed dozens of oil contracts with foreign companies.

    Interestingly, the world's biggest oil companies, Exxon, Shell, BP and Chevron, have avoided signing contracts with the KRG.

    Under this arrangement, international oil firms will not receive a share of Iraq's oil but they will be working in the country for the next 20 years with a 75 per cent stake in the operation. of northern Iraq which is controlled by the Kurdistan Regional Government.

    The oil revenues will all go to the federal government and the KRG will receive its 17 per cent share of the national budget to manage its region.

    Al-Shahristani, however, insists: "Any contracts for field development that is not approved by the federal government of Iraq has no standing with the Iraqi government and the oil companies have no right to work on Iraqi territory."

    The pipeline politics are likely to continue unless a deal is reached between the two parties.

    2011:


    Exxon, based in Irving, Tex., and the United States’ largest petroleum company, had become the first major international oil operator to sign a contract in the Kurdistan region — a move the company has neither confirmed nor denied.

    If Exxon did indeed sign a deal in Kurdistan, it is wading into a central controversy that has dogged Iraq since the American invasion.

    Oil has long been the heart of Iraq’s wealth, and the invasion threw control of the rich reserves into question, exacerbating longstanding enmity between the Kurds and other Iraqis. Under President George W. Bush, the passage of an oil law to split revenues was considered a crucial benchmark to bring long-term peace to Iraq.

    2012:

    As part of the Kurdistan Regional Government’s ongoing transparency initiative, the Ministry of Natural Resources is putting all signed production sharing contracts (PSCs) for oil and gas in the Kurdistan Region into the public domain, the ministery posted a statement on its website(KRG.org)
    The move, announced today by Minister of Natural Resources Ashti Hawrami, means that the PSCs, their attachments and amendments are now available to read online at the government website.
    Dr Hawrami said, “The Kurdistan Region Oil and Gas Council, headed by Prime Minister Barham Salih, has decided to take the next step in implementing our policy of transparency and commitment to freedom of information in Kurdistan’s oil and gas sector, in line with the Region’s oil and gas law of 2007.”

    http://www.krg.org/a/d.aspx?a=41567&l=12&s=010000
    http://www.proactiveinvestors.co.uk...d-on-production-sharing-contracts--33424.html
     
  12. odonII

    odonII O

    Messages:
    9,803
    Likes Received:
    26
    2035

    Oil-drilling boom puts US in global driving seat
    America is expected to become the largest crude oil producer in the world by 2020, overtaking Saudi Arabia and Russia.

    It is expected to reduce its imports from 10million barrels a day to about 4million barrels within ten years, the International Energy Agency forecast.
    It will become self-sufficient in about 2035 as a boom in shale gas output and tougher mileage standards for cars squeeze out imports.
    It is ‘a dramatic reversal of the trend seen in most other energy-importing countries’, the IEA said.
    ‘Energy developments in the US are profound and their effect will be felt well beyond North America and the energy sector.’
    Despite the rising use of low-carbon energy sources, huge subsidies will keep fossil fuels ‘dominant in the global energy mix’ for years, it added.
    'The recent rebound in U.S. oil and gas production, driven by upstream technologies that are unlocking light tight oil and shale gas resources, is spurring economic activity - with less expensive gas and electricity prices giving industry a competitive edge.'
    IEA Chief Economist Fatih Birol told a news conference in London he believed the United States would overtake Russia as the biggest gas producer by a significant margin by 2015.
    By 2017, it would become the world's largest oil producer, he said.


    Read more: http://www.metro.co.uk/news/917746-oil-drilling-boom-puts-us-in-global-driving-seat#ixzz2C6Fo0hsK
     
  13. ForgetThisEmail

    ForgetThisEmail Member

    Messages:
    369
    Likes Received:
    2

    :sunny: UNLESS YOU GET ONE OF THESE :sunny:


    .................................
    SOLN1 - Amazing all in one free energy unit.

    solar powered

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hy9wT7Vvkdw&feature=player_embedded
    #!


    HE SAYS HERE = http://laserhacker.com/forum/index.php#c1
    http://laserhacker.com/forum/index.php?board=2.0

    http://laserhacker.com/forum/index.php?topic=3.0

    I will be putting the links to the stuff I used here as well as on my website:

    LiteFuze 20W Mono-crystalline Solar Panel
    $62.99 Price should be about half when we source this direct in number.
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0079OA7SK"]http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0079OA7SK

    Duracell 175-Watt Pocket Inverter
    $39.99
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B004U1Y3VC"]http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B004U1Y3VC


    A POST HE MADE:
    People keep wondering about heat. These LiFePO4 batteries have a normal operating temp up to 140 degrees. Some brands are rated for even higher temps. Outdoor testing with temp measurements will be the only way to know for sure.

    ANOTHER POST HE MADE:
    Please check this out now!

    Posted by: T-1000 over at overunity.com

    Sorry guys for offtopic, there are important news today:


    http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/4864-donald-smith-devices-too-good-true-258.html#post213894


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mzE-p0GJb_Q&feature=em-unknown"]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mzE-p0GJb_Q&feature=em-unknown
     
  14. odonII

    odonII O

    Messages:
    9,803
    Likes Received:
    26
    Can you run a car on that?
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice