A Question For Circumcised Guys

When you are circumcised, does this mean you can't pull your foreskin (or you don't have any at all?) over your knob ( urethra end) anymore & that your tip rubs against your underwear & gets irritated occassionally?
JUST CURIOUS!

 

Dude. Seriously?

 

I just thought that when the piece of skin attached to the foreskin / knob was cut, that the foreskin would stay permanently pulled towards the base? I don't know what benefits there are from being circumcised?

 

Dude. SERIOUSLY???

 

girls love it. IME

 

when you have a boner there is no way you can get the skin over the tip...flacid it is possible to pull it up over the tip...but this involves considerable cramming...at east in my case it does..its not pleasant

it feels like any other part of my body that rubs against clothing...no problem

i hope this helps...

 

Girls love it because - the foreskin can stretch back further & easier or just the way it looks instead?

 

Yes, that answers my question - thanks!

 

girls dont know shit about dinks...they arent the ones that lost those nerve endings in a barbaric ritual

 

But remember, they are the one's who have to go thru the pain of giving birth & that's worse than loosing a bit of their nerve endings isn't it?
They are the one's who are in labour sometimes for many hours, & who have to go thru goodness what else during it.

 

ok fine...i have no clue why you are bringing that into this discussion..

.using your logic women have to put up with men in general and deserve a medal doing so...

.my point was that women dont know what it feels like to have a dick....they only know what it feels like to live with a dick

and society been telling them circumsized is somehow better or cleaner....dont you think uncircumsized dudes wash their junk?

it is slowly becoming normal to not chop off the tip of a baby boys penis...i did not let them chop my sons dink...i dont advise it

 

Yeah girls are lucky that they dont have to re-adjust their genitals like us guys have to at times & they don't need to worry about sitting down & squashing their's as well.
Re: washing foreskin : yeah I pull mine back & give it a good wash when showering - gets smelly if not done.

 

But I'm trying to become an expert..........!

 

not every circumcision is a barbaric ritual. in some cases circumcision is necessary.
i had mine because of tight foreskin, and my doctor has decided to go with full foreskin (I was 8 at that time)
as far as a irritation goes I do have problems with that, but only in the summer and if i am wearing wet boardshorts (not shore if correct term I meant those swim shorts that are essentially boxers but for swimming)

I would love to have my foreskin back, but mother nature had her say in it and plastic surgery is a bit drastic (and expansive).

 

I believe that when circumcision is forced on an infant for religious or customary reasons, when there is no medical reason for it, then that is nothing but barbaric, and Gerrmany is right to have outlawed it.

There are also many different techniques used with circumcision. I actually had to undergo the procedure back at the beginning of March because of a cycling injury some years ago, where scar tissue had continually been splitting & re-healing, making the foreskin gradually tighter & tighter, until it reached the stage that it was painful to retract it. My G.P. had tried various steroidal creams, but to no effect. It just eventually became clear that surgery was the only remaining option.

I had the surgery under local anaesthetic, so was able to chat to the surgeon during the procedure. Apparently he used the 'Sleeve resection' technique (see http://www.circlist.com/instrstechs/doublecirc.html), which comprised of cutting a collar of skin away from just beneath the frenulum, and then stitching the cut edges together (which he did an excellent job of - the seam was sewn inwardly, so the stitches weren't even visible).

As it happened, though, the scarring had gone so far that, as he described it, "the skin was like a rhinoceros", which meant that he couldn't cut quite as much as he had originally intended. This resulted, fortunately, in my still having a bit of remaining foreskin, so when flaccid it doesn't look much different to a non-circumcised penis, but when erect the remaining foreskin just about covers the coronal ridge.

After having had the surgery it was a bit of a job having to relearn how to masturbate, as a standard grip would mean that I would be constantly rubbing against the glans, which, without the use of lube could get very painful. But by moving the grip further down the shaft I still had the protection of the foreskin providing the glide motion. Alternatively, I could just masturbate even further down, just stimulating the shaft itself.
Fortunately, though, the use of my FleshLight (which had always required lubricant) was unchanged - if anything, improved, as I didn't have to bother with the problems of foreskin retraction any more.

However, if I could have my foreskin back, without the initial scarring problems that forced me to undergo the procedure in the first place, I would do so in a shot, and I certainly wouldn't advise anyone to have it done if they don't need it doing. Remember - it's a one-way ticket. Once done, there's no going back. The foreskin's there for a reason.

 

Girls love a CUT dick. But that doesnt always apply

 

Absolutely! Have to point out that it's America not society in general that circumsize for no reason. I'm a transplant here and I'm horrified by this act of genital mutilation performed on babies without anaesthesia. Are you freaking kidding me?????

Anaesthesia or no it's still an unnecessary and barbaric act. All the nonsense stories I have heard to justify circumsicion are just nonsense. If they were true then all European men would be afflicted since we do not circumsise unless absolutely necessary medically.

The sensitivity issue is a fact. Circumsised men lose sensitivity to the head of the penis. It being exposed and rubbing constantly. Circumcised men have the head protected and so when exposed it's really sensitive as it is supposed to be naturally. Nothing like an uncircumcised man gasping when you've finally unwrapped the present and got to the head licking part. Hehe!

 

What has that got to do with it? We go through a voluntary experience to produce a child. That then justifies mutilating that babies genitals to somehow even the score?

 

question was answered

we have enough of these dickskin debate threads already