Does anyone get aroused when they go barefoot in long pants?

I'd like to know if anyone has a relation between going barefoot and feeling arousal. Being barefoot implies that you wear long pants. There must be others who have this.

 

Oh? so you can't be barefoot wearing shorts? OK, that's new to me (being always barefoot and often wearing shorts :sunny

 

Yes, I even get aroused by just thinking about it.

 

Sometimes I barefoot in long pants, but I usually prefer to have them rolled up so at least my ankles are showing... keeps my cooler when it's warm out.

 

LOL....ditto

 

ditto

 

I dont think I get this Are you talking about long pants such as jeans etc. Or is it some kind of word-play?
Either way I think barefooting in long pants sucks, where the bottom of the legs that would normally sit on the tops of shoes flap around and scrape on the floor or even worse gets wet drives me crazy and is so uncomfortable. Even when I roll the legs up it either looks stupid like I've been paddling in the sea or I'm fussing with one being higher than the other or falling down ahhhhh...really I can't be doing with that! For me it's shorts or cropped pants....well thats my opinion anyway
As far as being aroused? Not unless there's something else going on in there

 

Me neither....aroused...no

 

simple answer, yes. can't explain why, though. also i find so much attractive women bf'ing in jeans or fluent skirts, while i hate shorts.

 

With you on that one jagerhans. Love to see fem barefooters + floor length fluent skirts/dresses. Ragged flared jeans too. All subjective preferences tho.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Jqc_b2cXss

 

yes, especially jeans a bit rolled up to don't step them (and make them black).

 

Yes, it's like being naked and no one knows. I thought this was my little secret lol.

 

Even though there are people doubting the science part of reflexology, there are spots in the soles, triggering sweet body reactions in sexual organs (knowledge about that can come in handy when doing foot massages ). That, combined with wearing loose-fit long pants, going commando, having the fabric flow around the body, occasionally stroking certain regions, can be arousing, indeed...

And, well, since walking barefoot is all about being happy, why not accept and allow this sweet and lusty form of happiness, too?

Wiggling bare toes, lustily,

~*Ganesha*~

 

I feel much more comfortable being barefoot in long pants. There is probably some arousal factor there but not too much. Now I used to date a girl who very much expressed her preference for me to go barefoot in baggy jeans. In fact the first few times I went barefoot in public were for her benefit (and later for my own). But I think a big part of it for her was that at the time I felt naked, exposed and very vulnerable if I was in public in my bare feet. Came to learn later she was big into her guys being vulnerable when she wanted them that way.

 

Long pants are the clothes that you wear on your bottom half that go down to your ankles. No word play here.

 

i can't say that I ever thought about that honestly...
but.. i don't wear shorts often, so I suppose that when I'm aroused, I'm usually in long pants and barefoot...

 

Long pants makes your feet seem more obviously naked. And there's the aspect of doing something "forbidden" that's at the same time sensual. So, my answer is yes.

 

So let's talk about going barefoot more!

 

I don't get this..... so the answer for me is probably no.

 

I would, if people would pick up after their dogs, put bottles in the proper recycling receptacle instead of smashing them on the ground and if the roads weren't so damn HOT in summer down under.

Seriously, you CAN fry an egg on our roads or footpaths in summer.