definitions of types of governments are all fubar.. no matter the type of government, people choose their own freedoms.. or oppression.. http://www.historyguy.com/nations/government_types.html
They also choose to Live or Die for all forms of Laws being applied: like Socrates did (the Crito) for and on behalf of the law being the law for essential Physics; being the law for definition of what a criminal was. Actually Marx believes in applying Law for jurisprudenz as well as traffic control. A man deserves to go through 'due process' if he causes a death in the working place like on an oil platform (no sense of humor:2thumbsup.
Ever make the mistake in applying too much lotion, so much that your pores refuse to accept it all....too much of anything is bad.
I'm against it as a form of national government, but for it where 100% of the participants find it agreeable. Any form of government is acceptable when ALL those governed accept it, and those who do not are allowed to pick up their belongings and leave.
But to socialism theory is the purpose of Life. Finally in communism that theory was realized from the practice, basically the practice of realizing that work ethic HAD no basis in possessing wealth for anything but "each to his needs, as each to his fulfillment of knowledge... for helping His fellowman"
wealth for the wealthy is wrong. we need to change things so that everybody has an equal share and nobody has more than anybody else. if thats communism then i am 100% for it. the rich boys in the big houses and the fancy neighborhoods need to give it up. all the rich hollywood stars who say they support the bolshevik revolution now happening in our streets need to put their money where their mouth is and give it up join us and tear down the empire of the rich. the proletariat has been exploited long enuf by the bourgeoisie.
You are either a complete fool, and/or oblivious to exactly how badly fucked the world is today, as a result of people like you on the other side of the globe an hundred or so years ago.
for communism. why? Because Marxs was an fucking genius but unfortunately stalin and lenin fucked it all up. p.s: all the countries on earth that clames that they are communistic/socialistic that isnt true real socialism wasn't never even tested
Marx sought to deny human nature, and so do you. I'm for fair systems. This involves a socialist system incorporating property rights and liberal doses of human rights. The ends justify the means is a pretty common thread of "communism", and it's NOT acceptable in my book. "capitalism" simply denotes a system that accepts the way the world works.... based on "capital", or material and mediums of exchange for material. This is reasonable, because everything is only made out of matter. It simply needs to be regulated..... That's all. Corporations are not people, and killing a corporation because it harms people should not be some sort of silly moral battle, they did wrong, they should be disbanded, the economy can't suffer if you don't decide it will, it's pretty imaginary.... a measure that took on a life of it's own.
True Communism has never been practiced socially (for any significant length of time), or as a form of government, and it never will. It requires everyone to divorce themselves from the concept of ownership and it requires a kind of hive mentality and selflessness that human beings are simply not capable of adopting. In order for communism to work, you'd have to have an ideologically homogeneous population of people who truly cared as much about others as they do for themselves - otherwise the selfish would rise to positions of power and exploit the rest. Sound familiar?
