I have aquired some Alex Greys, Avatars, Red Aum and Ganesh. So if you've tried them, rank them out of 10, and provide details. I've heard the former two are some the best in the world, is this true?
i took avatar, and they are some good shit ! best ive taken ever even though i dont have much other tabs to compare around here. better than the hoffmans fa shou
I had a red aum last night, which was pretty intense. I will post pictures when I'm done recovering and can be bothered to anything. I think the guy didn't give me avatars; he was pretty out of it. But I have lots of Alex Greys, which my friend vouched for.
what do you mean by "alex greys" . . . that is the name of an artist who's artwork is on a lot of different blotters, different paintings . . . in fact the front side of the ganesh hits is an alex grey piece
I dunno what's with all the blotter talk going on here. I mean it's interesting, but I find the people over on bluelight ar a lot more knowledgeable about the different blotters. They may get the dosages a bit wrong, but they can compare the blotters more from experience.
^^a few of the people on BL are also on here. your statement seems to be a gross generalization i found the ganesha's (with alex grey art on front) to be sorta weak IMO. but i only too 1 + 1 more an hour later. i'm saving the last three for a special time
Alex Greys and Ganeshas were the same print I thought.. They're good. but now the Avatars are a lot better. I wouldn't consider the Alex Greys some of the best. Red Aums I'm not familiar with unless they are the Red Shivas from like late 2009ish. In which case, I haven't tried those but have heard they were pretty good doses too.
Uhmm, How is that any different than what people do in this forum. How are they more knowledgeable? Comparing the strengths of different types of blotter all the while assuming that the sheet the guy in Australia is from the same lab/chemist/batch is the same as the one the guy in Canada has which of course is the same as the quality the sheet Joe in New Orleans has. The blotter paper can be bought online already perfed and ready to go, available to anybody. We all know that, so why does there always seem to be the assumption that just because it's the same artwork, it's the same quality of LSD? Back in the early days of blotter it was different because more often than not each print was unique to a certain lab/chemist and was printed by them. So you could be more confident that a certain print all came from the same person. Today you don't have that same type of confidence.
^^but if you try a tab or two, have a good trip, then you can be pretty sure it's the same stuff that's being pumped out by one major source. just because it's not the 60s anymore doesn't mean you can't still know your source but yes, it's possible that the same print is not the same dose.
The first part of your post is yet again an assumption. Without doing a complete assay of the substance, there really is no way of knowing whether or not it's from the same source. You should realize that Pork considering your education and profession. the bold party is what I'm trying to point out. Plus blotter really didn't start being used as a medium for LSD until the very late 60's/early 70's.
^^^well it wasn't much different in "the good ole days" if you're the one getting it from the source...then you know it's from the same source
Maybe you didn't get what I said. Back in the "good ole days" when blotter was first being used there weren't a bunch of different prints already available that they could just go and buy a ream of the paper like today. Producers of blotter would print the sheets themselves or "commission" somebody to do it. so you had prints that were unique to a certain producer. So if Joe Lysergic in Chicago got some blotter with a green star on an elephant print and Marty Mayhem in San Diego also got some green star on elephant print, they came from the same source because NOBODY else had/used the same print. That only lasted a few years because as blotter became a preferred medium, savvy printers started churning out prints for general sale, albeit underground sales. The same was true for tablet forms of LSD in the 60's. If it was White Lightning, Purple Haze or Blue Cheer it came from Owsley. If it was Orange Sunshine (originally) it came from Sand. There was almost a "branding" of sorts going on that does not occur today. Once a certain "brand" gained a good reputation and following, that's when the copycats went to work, most notably with Orange Sunshine. Any mother's son can order most if not all of the prints in circulation today online. That was not the case in the "good ole days". You all settled in yet Pork?
all settled in, still no internet though. i'm in lab right now. i won't deny that it's POSSIBLE for joe schmoe to get any blotter print and pass it off as the real stuff, but i still maintain that there is one huge source pumping out prints like hoffmans, shivas, ganeshas and even the red star microdots. if you see any of these, it PROBABLY came from that source and is PROBABLY some decently potent stuff
I agree that is most likely the case, but it shouldn't just be the automatic assumption. Just consider the unscrupulousness seller who decides to "piggy-back" on the popularity of a particular print/batch and knowingly produces and sells inferior or even blank blotter with the same print because everybody knows that the Shiva blotters are the bomb. Buyer beware. Each batch has to be taken on it's own merits IMHO.
