Alright, call me stupid- but what exactly is it? I know that its surgery on the err "netherregions" lol. Is there a visible difference? What's the point, what does it do? Do you have to handle 'it' differently? lol I DONT KNOW thanks a bunch
It's when the foreskin, which covers the sensitive glans, is surgically removed - usually for religious or cultural reasons - more rarely for medical reasons. Without it, the glans loses its natural moistness & sensitivity, dries up & changes from having the appearance of a ripe, shiny plum, to an old, withered prune.
there is a visual difference. Everyone has their own opinion in which they prefer. If a guy has it he just has to make sure to wash under it and to pull it back when he pees.
I'm not circumcised, and I from what I gather stimulation is somewhat different. I get stimulated by the sensation of the foreskin pulling back and forth over the head of my penis. That means long, deep stokes. I'm not sure if circumcised men have the same sensation. I didn't mean to sound graphic, but I think from a female's perspective, she probably needs to understand this and "handle" things a little differently.
I am circumcised and im stimulated by the bit were I imagine to foreskin was if that makes sense. Like in the front n stuff I dunno
i actually prefer my boyfriend's forskin ...there's just so much more you can do with an uncircumsized penis! *drool* lol
I'm circumcised and I chose to leave my son uncut. One if the issues, of course, is that a young boy feels out of place because his equipment looks different than mine and the other guys in gym class. I figured I was the right guy in the family line to make the transition from cut to uncut. Anyway, after a few worries when he was very young (he sometimes got some lint under the foreskin, and it got infected) I'm happy to say that he says everything works perfectly. I found the earlier comment about the scar tissue area being the easiest to stimulate interesting, and the same is generally true for me. That leaves to believe that uncircumcised males might have a bit more sensitivity. I wonder, though, is that good? I mean, lasting power is a good thing, right?
I was complimented about my "lasting power" just this morning. I don't know how it feels to be circumcised, so I can't say whether I would last longer or not. But I wonder if the sensation is simply "different", not "more" for us uncut dudes. I had a girlfriend who was about 24. I don't think she understood what circumcision was, either. One time the topic came up in conversation, and she had no idea I was uncircumcised, even though we had had sex many times. She asked me what the difference in appearance was.
