Getting circumsized need advice...

Regardless of my expierence, cutted, women talk, and all of my girlfriends have said the same thing to me. Just because YOU are different it hardly means that I am wrong. That sir, is what you call a BIAS, we all have them, but you stick to yours more then most and advise people to change things that can affect there ENTIRE life for GOOD and BAD, just because yours worked out so well for YOU doesn't mean that it will for EVERYONE. He has the RIGHT to know BOTH sides, not just yours.

 

Plus at least he has been allowed the right to CHOOSE whether or not to go for circumcision which, in my opinion, is how it should be.

Personally, I don't like ANY form of bodily mutilation, including ear-rings & tattoos, but that's my personal preference. However, I would be equally opposed to banning anyone from having them done to themselves by their own choice, once they are old enough to make the decision.

What I AM heartilly opposed to is this inane practice perpetuated by custom, culture & superstition of ritually mutilating a new born baby, leaving him absolutely NO choice for the future.

If you have never experienced the other side of the coin you are in no place to say what is better, although I have been with men who have had to undergo adult circumcisions for one reason or another & have nearly always regretted it. I was even involved in an accident once where my foreskin was half severed & was given the option of completing the circumcision or sewing it back on - Needless to say I opted for the stitches - even though that involved having to go for about 10 days without a release.

Make no doubt about it. I am far happier with this moist, shiny, sensitive head than I could ever be with a dulled wrinkled prune.

 

I think it depends on the person, I just think it's stupid that he's telling me that I need more expierence with cut men before I can say anything, I personally don't like the look of it and I'm engaged to get married to a man who isn't cut and I'm very happy with that. My fiancee would never have our son cut, but if our son decides when he's older to do so thats his choice.

But blindly encouraging someone to do something that can change so much about their sexuality isn't right, espcially considering that Cutted doesn't have the 'normal' circumsizion so in all fairness, he doesn't know what it's like to be really cut either.

 

I'm not circ'd and for years I wanted to be. Not for any physical reason. Just though women liked it better that way. But when I really looked into the whole issue I came to the realization that I am FAR better off intact. I'm 50 yrs old now and it is a matter of maturity for some. It takes time to except your body and understand nature made you the way you are.

My advice is not to do it. Give it some time and study the issue more. You too may come to the realization that you are actually one of the lucky one's. It is likely as you age you will be more sexually active longer.

Our naughty parts, both male and female are semi internal-external parts. Nature did this for a reason. Why? Because when we put them together it's great fun! That's way!

I have no doubt that the penetration of an intact penis is far more intense than the dried out type. The inner foreskin surface is in contact with the vagina walls and labia. A very intimate experience.

 

From a poll I saw, over half of the cut guys responding stated they could pull the loose skin up over at least part of the glans when erect, and some could pull it all the way up. And another poll I conducted showed that a greater percentage of women liked the feel of the coronal ridge inside them on the outthrust, rather than the gliding motion of the foreskin of the uncut penis. So it is a guy thing.

 

do you have links? and did the poll include only women who have felt both? or did it just ask anyone and get responses from women who had only had cut penises?.

nature makes these parts to work together, there is no assembly or modification required

 

Cloud 7 -They are either in this forum or the sex polls forum. Look for them.

 

yes and those asked or all women, as in most had never had an uncut penis and just know they aren't supposed to like intact genitals

 

I did not see that from the women who responded to the poll.

 

C'mon Cutted, you running a poll on circumcision, is as valid as Howard Dean running a poll on Republican talking points. Your bias is so pervasive in everything you write here, that it is more pathology than opinion. Get off the soap box and dance with real, people!

 

WOW its true that there is no such thing as an unbiased opinion i guess...
before reading this I felt ashamed to be uncut, but now I don't care either way.
So long as you're okay with whatever decision you make and it's because it's something that YOU want to do, then go with what feels right IMO

 

The poll I ran was in response to the views expressed here that it is so fantastic to have your foreskin roll back and forth over the glans during intercourse, and that women love the feeling as much as men do.

It seemed to me that this feeling was more a guy thing, and that the women having sex with an uncut guy whose foreskin is on a roll are missing out on the feeling of the coronal ridge of the glans frictioning back and forth inside the vagina. I have asked women I have been with if they can feel it and like it, and they uniformly say they do.

So the poll was created to get the opinion of women who have had sexual experience with both cut and uncut men, and which feeling inside them they liked better - the rolling of the foreskin, or the friction of the coronal ridge. The results were pretty even, with the coronal ridge feeling coming out a little ahead, and another large minority stating they like both sensations.

Since uncut gus usually masturbate by rolling the foreskin up and over the glans (as I do as well), I feel that the intercourse feeling just recreates that.

 

i wouldn't do it...at this age you will be in so much pain. Just make sure you keep it clean!
if the chick minds---screw her... i am curious though, and perhaps it is said somehow in the above post, but what is your decision??

 

Oooooooo no u didn’t

 

Cutted is back with his mutilation advice, I see. Every time I go overseas for a while, he pops back with his unethical and dangerous advice. Sorry I didn't get here in time, but the thought of a gf pussy whipping this lad into circumcision is repulsive. It is no one's choice other then the guy!!! Here we go again, Cutted...

 

My last comment was almost three years ago, dude. Where you been? Since then further studies have confirmed that circumcision substantially reduces the chances of getting a sexually transmitted disease. That alone justifies it, although it continues to be a matter of personal or familial choice.

 

It does reduce sensitivity.

Unless a person has a problem with this, as in you are overly sensitive, I would suggest not doing it.

To those who try to speak for all and say that uncut men are uniformly happy... pure bullshit... I'm cut, I think it was a terrible thing to do, especially considering it was done when I had no say over it. You can also do a simple google search to find out how many men look for things such as reconstructive surgery or non-surgical techniques to restore a foreskin.

Getting beyond that issue, the std issue... I guess if you routinely go around having unprotected sex (ie, are too stupid to use safe sex practices when unsure), then you may want to consider it.

The cleanliness issue was covered already... if you are too lazy to wash properly, you are likely better off without it.

But, unlike the issue of this over babies... if you choose to do it, I wish you the best.

 

Celibacy totally reduces the chances of getting a Sexually Transmitted Disease, so by your logic that alone should justify everyone remaining celibate.

 

oooooo looks liek cutted got cut up haaaay

 

I admire the courage of men like ChronicTom. They create change.