It is very valuable to tolerance for man to explain what is an interesting life. Ahmedinejad had one. Should we have to emphasize that over his obvious weaknesses to excessive intellectual disfavour to how a deep loving man and institution exists for the value of progress? He concides to the opinion that the west has to recede to the conditions of pre-oil-development materialism and how families in every one of their countries as well as our developed ones have committed to failure in faith of the very meaning of the family. The times change and there was so much happening both then and now for the theological conscience to the family. The real problem is how to evolve the state for internationalist support. Who in the middle east really stands for that Idea? Everything Ahmedinejad says and still says points out he wants peace for the mass communication and work. The truth is that the peace is to come by the sensible liberation of feminism and the progress of trust for the winners of the civilization. By burning the Koran America has shown Thay are not that. If Ahmedinejad were to come out and make a speech of something to that accord and that he supports Khadaffi, and that he supports Saudi Arabia; wouldn't he be have a successful speech? What does socialism come to explain about the justice of religions and the family life? Socialism can make it's own revolutionary content? Ahmedinejad needs to come out and talk.
If the world be two parts, the militant part and peaceful part, be sure Ahmadinejad is the leader of peace and war leader is Obama
Some kind of faith in Sadistic values for peace must be his view. He thinks he can get away with the Godless attitude of the West (like there really is one as much as in the cold war period nowadays).
The Liebermann-Obama connection too. America controls the world for --- keeping your shirt on. I actually figured out that Obama keeps good tabs on those (industrialist-type) business deals between Israel and Iran, while Liebermann has the war-mongering concern over Netanyahu; these are the idealists,:bobby:
More stuff on Ahmedinejad and the essential leadership in Iran. It should be noted America is not the enemy of Islam, but of certain Middle Eastern countries. Osama Bin Laden tended to push the Islamic conflict harder for reasons of belonging to the religion for the ordinary citizen as the cause of equlity vs. inequality. Now America is supposed to make out plausible Equality for a Muslim Nation? Are we all equal with the external effect of sharing tolerance, physically defending ourselves: really? http://english.aljazeera.net/news/middleeast/2011/05/201156113955925329.html
and a game of soccer.. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RLDR0yBuXLU"]YouTube - Dr. Ahmadinejad Playing Soccer ^ comments are the best..