Here's an interesting topic(in my opinion). The Amazing Athiest, love him, hate him? eh? Also, i've noticed he's strayed away from atheism videos, which isn't a bad thing. I like his style of covering the everyday bs. It's entertaining to me. What do ya'll think?
You mean Will Baker, of the "the meaning of Life" who combined Wittgenstein with Sartre for the formable world (world is all form, by the use of language) and the creation of the human body is the human fact of being a PERSON: terrible stuff to Sartre. Or is it just that he won't go out a limb and explain how Religions for the projection of systems of enlightenment...? have the System alter all by the new system (Heberamss's I think he could compose for a Sartrian like Hegel) be closed to the progress of technical filling of the amazingly discriminate Technology (WIttgenstein makes objectivism of our nowadays anyhow uncouth love affaires) : kills people by the choosing of injustice against the hopes of any Religious progress. Technology always had a MInd set to it: was, in a sense, morally created by the engineer for selfish, if you like, but really libertarian observed Values; "person"'s you individually MADE of yourself; the infamous: "I am the being by which values exist" Needs to ask the unsolvable to WIttgenstein: "Who am I?" "'God' is the Being by which the world allows Me to be Selfish." Hw do religions excuse the the some selfish people to get away with it? Well, in the case of the Earthquake there is no such God and the technology has no godlessness to to the self which would not defeat all of these phony explanations in Time.
Interesting opinion, what's he ignorent about? I know he's ignorent about vegetarianism, but i've never noticed him being ignorent about any other matter.
Well i feel from my own knowledge and research that he is rather ignorant when it comes to trashing eastern based religions. And well.. religion in general. He attacks religions cultural context rather than debasing there inherent philosophies.
Well, i use to be Christian and i've never heard him say anything untrue about it. And i've read the entire bible. The problem with religion is that it's not something you can effectively analyse because the man behind it is "out of this world", so anything anyone says about it can be considered ignorant, wether defending it, believing it, attacking it, or not believing it. And the things he's said about what's written IN the verious realigous books isn't incorrect, he's just percieving them differently from the people who believes it. So in the case i guess it's safe to say he's ignorant.
I'm talking about His whining record for faking neo-liberalism as a conservative. He also wrote some assorted essays and poems on a web-page by the offered title.
he's brilliant- funny, charismatic and his videos are refreshing when accompanied with thunderf00t's. I don't think he's ignorant at all, he just gets angry when people act and speak irrationally or illogically.
Just a youtube celeb nothing more and less. I watched one of his videos where he was bashing Justin Bieber and his fans. It did not convinced me. Perfect way to get more views. More likely the cheapest way.
