Republican reading of U.S. Constitution interrupted...

Then who owns the United States? The British East India company was essentially dissolved after it an uprising in India it failed to contain which was the catalyst that brought a good deal of India under direct parliamentary rule. So who's going to shutdown and buyout the shares of the United States after our failed attempt to put down rebellion in Afghanistan.

 

And you know what???
It has been and there are thousands that have won. You just have to really research the "tricks" that are played to get YOU to play THEIR game.

You are only required to adhear to the only 3 laws that actually exist.
1) Don't hurt anyone.
2) Do not cause loss
3) Do not commit fraud.

After that, everything from traffic court to smoking pot or paying your mortgage is not a law. It is a statute and you are not required to obey statutes.

In short, do as the Amish or the Gypsies and there is fuck all they can do to you. ((Mind you this does not protect you from the shit they have done to our food or the assholes with tasers and guns))

In 1944, under the Bretton Woods Agreement, Corp. U.S. is quit claimed to the International Monetary Fund, and becomes a foreign controlled private corporation.

So to answer your question,
The International Monetary Fund controls Corp US.

 

Actually the Bretton Woods agreement was completely nullified by the Nixon shock, so yeah.

 

Nixon nullified the "quasi" gold-standard that they agreed to.
Corp US remained a possession of the IMF and according to the IMF he was asked step down as president of corp us. But refused and we of course have seen how things worked out for him later.

 

Except the US is the largest budget contributer to the IMF and is the only country with a high enough voting share to single handily block voting on major decisions. So once again yeah.

 

Some days explaining this to people is like trying to explain rocket science to a red neck. All he wants to see is big boom and heavy projectiles flying through the air.

Corp US quite claimed to the IMF. A "QuiteClaim" is a when you give up all rights, titles, etc. to the property in question.

In short, you walk away and say "Fuck it! I don't want it so just fucking take it. It's not my problem anymore."

Therefore, corp US is not the property of the United States Government. Because the United States government ceased to exist in 1933. Being a corporation it existed as a seperate entity for a few years. Until it too became in debt to the bank (The IMF) And rather than face forclosure, it Quite Claimed to the IMF and therby becoming the property of the IMF.

So corp US is just the largest coporation that the IMF owns. And when you have a cartel of corporations, each being owned by a common "'source'" Shares are allocated in relation to '"size'".

Now all of this has no fucking bearing on the control of the IMF. Because the IMF is the owner of corp US and not the other way around.

 

I think this thread has been hi-jacked by the crazies and conspiracy theorists. Can we get back to the OP which is where O'bama was born, and why it makes a difference.

For instance, does the literal interpretation of the constitution preclude foreign-born children of oversea's diplomats from becoming president.

 

It depends, the Constitution literally says

You have have to be a natural born citizen of the US. To be a citizen you either have to be born on US soil, or if you're born outside the country can be attained if:

 

i dont think it matters where he was born he hasent done shit yet and hes not gonna get overthrown. you just gotta wait another 2 years before sarah palin can become president :love:

 

God save us if that happens

 

I thought the controversy was that his father was a citizen of kenya, not that he wasn't born in hawaii.

http://www.hipforums.com/newforums/showthread.php?t=417189&page=2

 

Nope, you got it wrong. Nobody questions that the father was Kenyan. Seemingly some people think the son was born not in Hawaii, but in Kenya.

 

time to take away the vote for children

 

lincoln's been dead for 145 years

edit: oh, wait, you must mean teddy roosevelt, he's only been dead for, ah, crap, need to wiki that . . .

 

i'm not surprised you think that is funny.. fact is, it is true and in a proper court of law those facts could be argued and won, legally!...

 

cleaned up my post a bit. it was a bit messy (like my room).
my bad.

by 'black president' it was to imply they can have anyone they choose as their president, and I modified the post to make this clear. The ones who have higher equitable title to the corporation choose: Baruch may possess it, but who has the right to choose who gets to possess: bankers/owners. It's that damn 1/10th of the title..

the point is it's their corp, they can do whatever the hell they damn well please with it.

and if you are trespassing as a patriotard on it, while trying to 'restore the republic', whoa be 2 u.
just be careful you are not trespassing on their claim.

 

A proper court of law being a HipForums court I presume.

 

Damn, i get everything wrong...