Where is your protest sign? And I agreed to leave you alone. Just what makes you think that this is the only group being targeted? Perhaps there is a growing number of people harrasing and targeting other forums trying to get people to wake up? Maybe they even do things like meet in an IRC chat channel. I'm not saying that this is the situation. Just asking if you ever considered it. If you can't get to a library, try and use google. It's better than nothing.
It is playing out that patented genes are escaping the packaging and affecting agriculture over all in such terms as disease and pest resistance compounding the need for expensive chemical treatments.
instead of protesting, i prefer to do useful, positive things besides, i live in a small agricultural town - the only protesting i've ever seen here was by teabaggers you'd like them, they also believe in fairy tales like "natural law"
Alright name 5 positive things you do to help fix just the problem of OGM food in this world? I've posted links to websites with definitions. Go and do some research and educate yourself. What you wrote was the gobbly-gook of someone trying to make an argument out of nothing. I recommend you get a copy of Blacks Law. There is a pocket version of Black's Law Dictionary available on Amazon. http://www.amazon.com/Blacks-Law-Dictionary-Bryan-Garner/dp/031406690X"]Amazon.com: Blacks Law Dictionary (9780314066909): Bryan A. Garner, Becky R. McDaniel, David W. Schultz: Books Or if you really want to get serious. Here is the link to the 9th edition hardcover. (Looks like there are still 12 used copies available for about 95 bucks) http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0314199500/ref=pd_lpo_k2_dp_sr_2?pf_rd_p=1278548962&pf_rd_s=lpo-top-stripe-1&pf_rd_t=201&pf_rd_i=031406690X&pf_rd_m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&pf_rd_r=0YZRXD862EGXFPA5BWVS"]Amazon.com: Black's Law Dictionary: Deluxe Ninth Edition (9780314199508): Bryan A. Garner: Books
ya know, hate-laughter reminds me of a woman i met the other night the local food co-op held a dinner to thank people who'd volunteered to get the thing going one of them invited some person in town from detroit who had nothing to do with anything at dinner with all us small-town hicks trying to create an atmosphere conducive to local food, small farming, and a little bit of culinary culture, this creature spent the evening complaining about the place - and telling us all how wonderful detroit was [i did feel obligated to mention that the two people i knew from detroit vastly preferred living in south-central los angeles and glendive's own el centro motel] hate-laughter is similar because in a place full of would-be friends, he or she has brought a better-than-thou attitude, and turned many of us into enemies are you from detroit?
And of course you didn't even mention * 1 * thing that you do that is "positive" I'm sure if this was a poker game 1 holier-than-thou that gets off his ass would beat a 100 enemies that whine about being disturbed during their favorite show. You claim to be focused on positive actions but you have stated none. Following the same path of logic, what does it matter if you call yourself my friend or my enemy. It will all come down to the same "nothing."
what's my favorite show? btw, that thing you said about the bricks and windows, reminds me of something, hmm...houses, glass, what?
All you have done is to characterize my statement without addressing content. I think you would do well in obtaining some basic remedial education.
ya see, here's the thing you want us all to do something, to help you in your noble quest how do you go about this? by telling us what a bunch of lazy, facebook-using, television-watching losers we are so exactly how can we help you, or more precisely, why would we want to? btw, thanks for the tv, i didn't have one before...
Knowing that this is off the subject of the thread, this is one example of contradictory premises being self defeating.
If this is too complicated to follow. Please ask questions and I'll try to explain it better. This material was difficult for me the first time I read it. ------ In order for a law to be a "Law" it must carry some sort of penalty or retribution for breaking that law. Without penalty, it has no consequence to enforce it and is therefore not a law. In the case of Natural Laws the penalty for causing "Harm or Loss" is "Harm or Loss." The best example is the old biblical saying of "an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth." Therefore the only debate that exists in all my comments is not the law. But are we or would we be justified in throwing a brick through a politician's window. I will therefore argue that since we have been 1) Lied to repeatedly (Fraud) 2) Had and are still having our food, water and air poisoned. (Harm) 3) Our children killed in wars based on lies (harm, loss and fraud) That we are justified in taking actions against those that have done these things. Therefore, "Eye for an Eye" and therby enforcing natural law. Not to get off topic on Natural law/common law. But it is interesting to note that both frech civic code and the United Nations acknowledge the right to revolt against a government when it causes harm, loss or fraud to the people it governs, when they avoid appropriate redress. The reason you want to do this is for Clean Food, Clean Water, Clean Air, no government survailance, etc. In short the ability to live your life without having to worry about some bigshot mega-rich asshole fucking up the enviroment or fucking you over. Also I'm not asking you to help me. I'm asking you to HELP YOURSELF and therby helping me. Simply put, I'm more than willing and able to clean up the shit in my own backyard. (so to speak) The problem is YOUR SHIT is in my back yard and I can not clean up my backyard when you keep throwing your shit keeps coming over the fence messing up my yard. So I need you to get your backyard clean so that I can get my yard clean. In short, fix the problems with the asshole corrupt government and corporations in the United States and the rest of us will find it easier to take care of our own jack-asses
someone just shot a congressperson and a bunch of bystanders in arizona where exactly are you located?
My guess is Montreal. The problem with throwing rocks and other disorderly deeds is doing so feeds a propaganda mill that easily paints the act as criminal. Causing property damage will get you locked up and will discredit your message- seems counter-intuitive if the intent is to raise awareness in the criminal exploits of United States, Incorporated. The vast majority of people accept without question the premise that it is a legitimate governing body... so there's a ready presumption that individuals standing against it are criminals. Partaking in an act of criminal mischief reinforces that. Shooting a congressperson is even worse.
They locked up Ghandi, Malcolm X, Assange and countless others. Being called a criminal just appears to be part of course. Awarness means nothing unless it leads to actions. Furthermore, most americans are "aware" of the problems but choose to do nothing about them. So I'm not advocating any form of additional awarness unless that awareness leads to directly to fixing the problems. So now that you have knocked down my solution. What is yours? Because it's not exactly a problem solving strategy to shoot down one a solution without offering one of your own. So my bubba, I'm all ears. If you got a better idea, I'll gladly stand shoulder to shoulder with you. Just for the record. I said brick through a politician's window not shooting the politician. Although I don't doubt that many, if not most, politicians deserve to be shot. I just believe we should start slowly and only progress as far as need be and no futher. Ie. Eye for an eye. Not a head, arm, leg and first born for an eye.
but you haven't proposed a solution either unless it's throwing bricks through windows? really? mmm...the only politician within bike range is the mayor and city council except i suppose they live on the west side or in the heights, and my bicycle is such a mess that it won't go up hills, and certainly not on the ice oh well...i'll just throw a brick through my own window, since i seem to be the problem too, right? [it's gonna be cold this winter] anyways, if i were to find a politician's window and throw a brick through it, i suppose a neighbor might see me they'd tell the police, oh it was that weird guy with the beard that feeds stray cats i'd be arrested before i even got home is that helpful to you?
The riots of 2005 in France. The grandchildren of Algerian immigrants to france were tired of being excluded and treated like 2nd class citizens of France. It was their grandparents that were the immigrants and not them but the majority of 3rd generation french born Algerians were still living in conditions similar to their grand parents. France's buracracy demands that each person have a dossier and a birth certificat that details who their parents were and legal status but up to several generations. These dossier in order to be considered complete by french statutes, need to include information on their grand parents. They needed to know where their grand parents lived, their marital status, which church they were married in, if they were baptised and what their professions were. An incomplete dossier often kept them excluded from governmental services and institutions. Added to this fact that the police routinely targeted and harrassed anyone of algerian ancestory and France's government refused to acknowledge any complaints. So in 2005 they took to the streets and started to burn cars. For more than 3 weeks, literally thousands of cars where set on fire all over France. Hundreds were arrested but in the end the damage was done and French governement was left with no choice but deal with the problem and take steps to break the back of their racist bureaucracy. So yes, I recomend breaking windows. And really when you think about it logically. A broken window really is pretty tame. But it does make a lot of noise and tends to get people's attention. In the end, These politicians by virtue of their inablity to operate in the best interests of the public. By their corruption love of catering to corporate greed have knowingly and wilfully commited harm, loss and fraud. It is therefore, now time to enforce the law against them. Therefore, since the government/corporately owned judicial system is structured to favor large corporations and the mega-wealthy. We are left with only the options of protests that must intensifer until they pay the penalty for the actions and submit to the will of the people. ------------- Now if you don't want to throw bricks through windows. You can call your local TV station and go on a hunger strike.