I AM NOT SAYING MARIJUANA WILL KILL YOU. Marijuana by itself is completely harmless. what i am saying is, when you smoke it, you are often using blunts, and/or other types of paper that over time will kill you. Also, how many times in your life do you think you actually smoked PURE weed with no other drug or substance on it, which over time will also kill you. Yes you can ingest weed or do many other things with it but how many people actually eat marijuana every time they want to get high?
Yes, and the fact that other animals (and/or insects) may also have a relationship with cannabis does not preclude that cannabis (and/or mushrooms) may have helped our species evolve.
If anything it would lend itself to the idea that perhaps, at least those two, have helped many species evolve. Maybe manking just evolved a little farther because we indulged a little more.
me and all my friends use pipes or bongs 95% of the time, and I`d guess that a lot of other people do the same, but thats beside the point. It`s been said, inhailing hot smoke into your lungs is not good for them, but weed has not been shown to kill anyone ever, and I would bet money that rolling papers don`t cause cancer. So while your lungs might not be in great shape after years of smoking, it will not kill you. and as for the laced theory.. that would go away after legalization, or you could just grow your own. And assuming you don`t go to a super shady dealer in the ghetto... (I buy mine from someone who grows..) I don`t see why you think it would be laced. seriously, why? any evidence at all that street marijuana normaly has other chemicals in it? Where are you getting this information? Are you just pulling it out of your ass? I`d love a link.
The concern with smoking cannabis is that, as opposed to cigarettes, when one smokes cannabis they hold it in for a longer period of time. This gives the smoke longer time to cause harm as well it can sometimes result in air getting trapped in the chest cavity, which can be very harmful, as it can cause a lung/lungs to collapse. However I don't think this is a very common issue at all.
I`ve also heard this, but the fact that pot smokers hold in the smoke for a little longer is (from what I remember, I read this a while ago) doesn`t actualy have much significance when you consider that the average pot smoker doesn`t smoke every day, (unlike most cig smokers) and when you compare how much weed is smoked in a lifetime to the 2 packs a day (or more) of cigs that someone might smoke every day for 50 years, much less smoke is inhaled by weed smokers and much less damage is done to the lungs.
Agreed. Though I'm not sure that many smokers smoke two packs a day. That's pretty hardcore. Also, it is advised, naturally, that people smoke tobacco free spliffs, as when combined it isn't very good for your lungs. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w9ySCcnoo3c"]YouTube - Bill Hicks - non smokers
inhaling tobacco and holding it in is way more harmful than cannabis.. The native americans used tobacco as an anesthetic=/ taking the smoke in a bellows forcing the smoke into a person, having them knocked out cold, to perform minor surgeries/ like tooth extractions ... Only tobacco smoke can do this.. you can recover, but be very dizzy and nauseous.< the same with other anesthesia side effect.. Theoretically each time you inhale tobacco smoke, you could say your inhaling the same properties that Duster Gas/ Freon has- Fact: Freon is used to lighten tobacco/ Pull the nicotine and tars from it as it is a solvent/ It also leaves trace elements behind. comparatively who has put Tobacco and Freon to the Test?.. Dont have to, they both KNOCK THE WIND OUT OF A HUMAN BEING... get it?..
arnold is probably playing a game with this to see what kind of reaction he will get from saying what he said about it
haha.. Youre right.. I may have spoken a little rashly. but the point works either way. and I love that clip.. :rofl:
If someone wants to smoke a damn joint they should be able to. Booze causes way more problems than pot. Drunks get angry and wanna fight, or you have your "crying" drunks...what a drag. Pot heads just want their music and some snacks. I think ONLY people with illnesses that smoking weed can help them deal with should be able to vote on the legalize pot prop. God forbid I ever have to deal with MS and have some healthy fucking politician(lobbyist) tell me what I can and can't use to feel better. A total crock of shit. Fuck the Man.
So no one cares if I smoke a joint right? I don't have to worry about legal prosecution, I can just go ahead and smoke one?
I like him better now that he's not a politician anymore. I'm glad he decriminalized pot, but I wish he would have been more supportive of prop 19.
I love the way Arnold thought he was going to transform the state. He achieved very little, far less than any other career he's had. And he's left the state far worse off than when he was elected, but it's not all his fault. But like every Republican & many dems, he's full of promises he'll never keep. Does he still want to be president? I bet he's soured on that idea now.
Arnold is my idol. Speaks publicially about his views on marijuana, even as someone pretty high up in the government.
Just to clarify the earlier mentioned dissatisfaction with Arnold's statement about how the Proposition was poorly written coming after the defeat: Arnold had been saying he didn't want the bill to pass the whole time, because he felt that it was poorly written. http://dl5.activatedirect.com/fs/distribution:letterFile/yvcee9xanplikz_files/z65ij4mzqc9pon?&_c=d Arnold was very clear about his dissatisfaction with Prop 19 almost a month before the vote, and even before that. Just because he said it was poorly written afterwards doesn't ensure that he didn't say something before guys. Come on, don't hate the Governator. Carry on